Fix CVE-2023-45803 and CVE-2024-37891 #773
Conversation
Fix vulnerability found in lower releases
|
Bumping this up |
WalkthroughThe Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Warning Review ran into problems🔥 ProblemsErrors were encountered while retrieving linked issues. Errors (2)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Disabled knowledge base sources:
- Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
integration_tests/requirements.txt(1 hunks)
| pytest-html | ||
| filelock | ||
| urllib3==2.0.6 | ||
| urllib3 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❓ Verification inconclusive
Security fix is insufficient: unpinning does not guarantee CVE remediation.
CVE-2023-45803 requires urllib3 v1.26.18 or v2.0.7, and CVE-2024-37891 requires urllib3 version 1.26.19 or version 2.2.2. The original version 2.0.6 is vulnerable to both. However, removing the version pin entirely doesn't guarantee these fixes will be installed—any version of urllib3 (including vulnerable ones) could be resolved during pip install. This creates non-deterministic and potentially insecure dependency behavior across installations.
For proper security remediation in integration tests, specify a minimum version that contains both fixes (e.g., urllib3>=2.2.2) or document why a specific older version is acceptable.
Consider updating the requirement to:
-urllib3
+urllib3>=2.2.2Or, if staying on the 2.0.x line is intentional, document that choice explicitly since the 2.x 2.0.7 version exists but CVE-2024-37891 is only fixed in 2.2.2.
I need to verify the CVE information before finalizing. Let me search for the specific vulnerability details.
Security fix is insufficient: unpinning does not guarantee CVE remediation.
CVE-2023-45803 has been addressed in versions 1.26.18 and 2.0.7, and CVE-2024-37891 requires either version 1.26.19 or version 2.2.2. The original pinned version 2.0.6 is vulnerable to both. However, removing the version pin entirely doesn't guarantee these fixes will be installed—any version of urllib3 (including vulnerable ones) could be resolved during pip install. This creates non-deterministic and potentially insecure dependency behavior across installations.
For proper security remediation in integration tests, specify a minimum version that contains both fixes (e.g., urllib3>=2.2.2), as the 2.0.x series does not have fixes for CVE-2024-37891.
Consider updating the requirement to:
-urllib3
+urllib3>=2.2.2📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| urllib3 | |
| urllib3>=2.2.2 |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
integration_tests/requirements.txt around line 6: the dependency urllib3 was
unpinned which does not ensure CVE fixes; update the requirement to enforce a
minimum safe version that includes both CVE fixes (e.g., change the line to
require urllib3>=2.2.2) so pip cannot resolve a vulnerable release and
installations are deterministic with the patched version.
|
Thanks for the contribution! |
3 participants
Fix vulnerability found in lower releases
Summary by CodeRabbit