Skip to content

Conversation

@arbiv
Copy link
Contributor

@arbiv arbiv commented Jun 19, 2025

null

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the way dbt package versions are installed in the GitHub Actions workflow, including a temporary upper version limit for the databricks_catalog warehouse type to address a known issue.
    • Applied a temporary version restriction on the dbt-databricks dependency to maintain compatibility until the related issue is resolved.

@arbiv arbiv linked an issue Jun 19, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@arbiv arbiv had a problem deploying to elementary_test_env June 19, 2025 09:39 — with GitHub Actions Error
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 19, 2025

Walkthrough

The change updates the dbt package version specifiers in the GitHub Actions workflow and the pyproject.toml for the dbt-databricks dependency. It adds an explicit upper version bound <1.10.2 as a temporary workaround for a known issue, switching all version constraints from <= to the compatible release operator ~=.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/test-warehouse.yml Updated dbt package install commands to use ~= instead of <=; added upper bound <1.10.2 for databricks_catalog with a comment referencing a related issue.
pyproject.toml Restricted dbt-databricks version upper bound to <1.10.2 with a comment about the temporary workaround for a known issue.

Poem

In the garden of code, a version grows,
With tildes and bounds, the workflow flows.
Databricks catalog gets a cap for now,
Awaiting a fix, we hop and bow.
🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4b3d76c and b1c16b2.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/test-warehouse.yml (1 hunks)
  • pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • pyproject.toml
  • .github/workflows/test-warehouse.yml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: code-quality
  • GitHub Check: test / test

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

👋 @arbiv
Thank you for raising your pull request.
Please make sure to add tests and document all user-facing changes.
You can do this by editing the docs files in this pull request.

@arbiv arbiv temporarily deployed to elementary_test_env June 19, 2025 09:39 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@arbiv arbiv had a problem deploying to elementary_test_env June 19, 2025 09:39 — with GitHub Actions Error
@arbiv arbiv temporarily deployed to elementary_test_env June 19, 2025 09:39 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@arbiv arbiv temporarily deployed to elementary_test_env June 19, 2025 09:39 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@arbiv arbiv had a problem deploying to elementary_test_env June 19, 2025 09:39 — with GitHub Actions Failure
@arbiv arbiv temporarily deployed to elementary_test_env June 19, 2025 09:39 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@arbiv arbiv temporarily deployed to elementary_test_env June 19, 2025 09:39 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@arbiv arbiv temporarily deployed to elementary_test_env June 19, 2025 09:39 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@arbiv arbiv temporarily deployed to elementary_test_env June 19, 2025 09:39 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@arbiv arbiv temporarily deployed to elementary_test_env June 19, 2025 09:39 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@arbiv arbiv temporarily deployed to elementary_test_env June 19, 2025 09:39 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@arbiv arbiv temporarily deployed to elementary_test_env June 19, 2025 09:39 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/test-warehouse.yml (1)

125-125: Clarify the TODO comment’s removal criteria
The workaround note is helpful, but add specific conditions or a target milestone/issue resolution date to ensure the TODO doesn’t linger indefinitely.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0c442e1 and 4b3d76c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/test-warehouse.yml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (13)
  • GitHub Check: test (1.8.0, databricks_catalog) / test
  • GitHub Check: test (1.8.0, athena) / test
  • GitHub Check: test (1.8.0, bigquery) / test
  • GitHub Check: test (athena) / test
  • GitHub Check: test (redshift) / test
  • GitHub Check: test (snowflake) / test
  • GitHub Check: test (databricks_catalog) / test
  • GitHub Check: test (bigquery) / test
  • GitHub Check: test (1.8.0, snowflake) / test
  • GitHub Check: test (postgres) / test
  • GitHub Check: test (1.8.0, redshift) / test
  • GitHub Check: test (1.8.0, postgres) / test
  • GitHub Check: code-quality
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/test-warehouse.yml (1)

126-126: Verify the combined pip version specifier
Ensure that dbt-databricks<1.10.2,~=… enforces the intended range under PEP 440 semantics.

You can simulate resolution without modifying the repo:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify pip resolves to the highest patch <1.10.2
pip download "dbt-databricks<1.10.2,~=1.10.1" --no-deps -d /tmp

@arbiv arbiv had a problem deploying to elementary_test_env June 19, 2025 09:45 — with GitHub Actions Error
@arbiv arbiv requested a review from haritamar June 19, 2025 09:46
@arbiv arbiv force-pushed the 1931-elementary-data-0183-report-errors-when-using-databricks branch from 4b3d76c to b1c16b2 Compare June 19, 2025 09:56
@arbiv arbiv temporarily deployed to elementary_test_env June 19, 2025 09:56 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@arbiv arbiv merged commit 95999ac into master Jun 19, 2025
5 checks passed
@arbiv arbiv deleted the 1931-elementary-data-0183-report-errors-when-using-databricks branch June 19, 2025 10:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Elementary-data 0.18.3 report errors when using Databricks

3 participants