Skip to content

Conversation

@elazarlachkar
Copy link
Contributor

@elazarlachkar elazarlachkar commented Sep 17, 2025

null

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated an internal data-reliability dependency to a newer revision to align with upstream improvements.
    • This maintenance update aims to improve stability, compatibility, and performance of monitoring workflows and may include upstream bug fixes and optimizations.
    • No user-facing functional changes are expected; existing behavior should remain unchanged.

@elazarlachkar elazarlachkar self-assigned this Sep 17, 2025
@linear
Copy link

linear bot commented Sep 17, 2025

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 17, 2025

Walkthrough

Updated the git revision for the dbt-data-reliability dependency in elementary/monitor/dbt_project/packages.yml and the corresponding entry in elementary/monitor/dbt_project/package-lock.yml from cbabcb2c348be2b4c45ad72c3b94e7800a52a542 to 0f59f9f5407db890780f225f6c1e362f38221133.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Dependency revision bump (packages)
elementary/monitor/dbt_project/packages.yml
Updated git ref for https://github.com/elementary-data/dbt-data-reliability.git to commit 0f59f9f5407db890780f225f6c1e362f38221133.
Dependency revision bump (lockfile)
elementary/monitor/dbt_project/package-lock.yml
Updated git revision and sha1_hash for the same git dependency to match commit 0f59f9f5407db890780f225f6c1e362f38221133 (sha1 -> 0dde8f6be0323bd473ea26bae571cef6d53d8fba).

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • ofek1weiss
  • michael-myaskovsky

Poem

A rabbit taps the checksum stone,
Swaps a hash, then hops back home.
Two tidy lines in YAML beds,
Point our models to fresher heads.
Commit hopped in—now onward goes! 🥕🐇

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The title "Update DBT package version" succinctly and accurately describes the primary change in this PR, which updates the dbt-data-reliability git dependency revision in elementary/monitor/dbt_project/packages.yml and the corresponding package-lock.yml, and is clear enough for a teammate scanning PR history.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch ele-5074-index-test_result_rows

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

👋 @elazarlachkar
Thank you for raising your pull request.
Please make sure to add tests and document all user-facing changes.
You can do this by editing the docs files in this pull request.

@arbiv arbiv self-requested a review September 17, 2025 12:16
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
elementary/monitor/dbt_project/packages.yml (1)

5-5: Prefer a tag/release over a raw commit when available (optional).

If a release tag exists for this SHA, consider switching to a tag for traceability and supply‑chain hygiene. Example:

-  - git: https://github.com/elementary-data/dbt-data-reliability.git
-    revision: 0f59f9f5407db890780f225f6c1e362f38221133
+  - git: https://github.com/elementary-data/dbt-data-reliability.git
+    tag: vX.Y.Z

If you want, I can look up whether this SHA corresponds to a released tag and suggest the exact value.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Disabled knowledge base sources:

  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cf75564 and 9fe09fe.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • elementary/monitor/dbt_project/packages.yml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: test / test
  • GitHub Check: code-quality
🔇 Additional comments (1)
elementary/monitor/dbt_project/packages.yml (1)

5-5: LGTM on the pin — commit present; regenerate & commit lockfile

  • Verified: commit 0f59f9f5407db890780f225f6c1e362f38221133 exists on the remote.
  • Action: elementary/monitor/dbt_project/packages.lock not found — run (cd elementary/monitor/dbt_project && dbt deps) and commit the generated packages.lock; ensure it pins the above SHA.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
elementary/monitor/dbt_project/package-lock.yml (1)

5-6: Prefer regenerating the lock via dbt, not manual edits.

To avoid drift and checksum mistakes, update packages.yml and then run dbt deps to regenerate package-lock.yml (commit both files). Consider adding a CI check that runs dbt deps and fails if the lock changes.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Disabled knowledge base sources:

  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9fe09fe and 56d8f23.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • elementary/monitor/dbt_project/package-lock.yml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: test / test
  • GitHub Check: code-quality
🔇 Additional comments (1)
elementary/monitor/dbt_project/package-lock.yml (1)

5-6: Verify pinned git revision and tarball SHA1

packages.yml and package-lock.yml both point to revision 0f59f9f5407db890780f225f6c1e362f38221133 and package-lock lists sha1_hash 0dde8f6be0323bd473ea26bae571cef6d53d8fba. The sandbox could not download the GitHub tarball due to SSL certificate verification errors, so the sha1 could not be validated. Re-run the verification script (or download the archive for that commit locally/CI and compute the SHA‑1) and confirm the computed hash matches the lock; if it does not, regenerate package-lock.yml or update the hash.

revision: cbabcb2c348be2b4c45ad72c3b94e7800a52a542
sha1_hash: 90d912df8d9c6a435f1936c7d93e4bf6c0efc4dd
revision: 0f59f9f5407db890780f225f6c1e362f38221133
sha1_hash: 0dde8f6be0323bd473ea26bae571cef6d53d8fba
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix YAML indentation for sha1_hash (breaks parsing).

sha1_hash must be nested under the same list item as git and revision. It’s currently top‑level due to missing indentation and will cause YAML parse errors / dbt to ignore the lock entry.

Apply this diff:

-sha1_hash: 0dde8f6be0323bd473ea26bae571cef6d53d8fba
+    sha1_hash: 0dde8f6be0323bd473ea26bae571cef6d53d8fba
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
sha1_hash: 0dde8f6be0323bd473ea26bae571cef6d53d8fba
sha1_hash: 0dde8f6be0323bd473ea26bae571cef6d53d8fba
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In elementary/monitor/dbt_project/package-lock.yml around line 6, the sha1_hash
key is incorrectly placed at top level instead of nested under the same list
item as git and revision; indent sha1_hash so it is a child of the same mapping
that contains git and revision (match the indentation level of git/revision for
that list entry) so the YAML parser and dbt will associate the hash with the
correct package entry.

@elazarlachkar elazarlachkar merged commit acdac83 into master Sep 17, 2025
7 checks passed
@elazarlachkar elazarlachkar deleted the ele-5074-index-test_result_rows branch September 17, 2025 14:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants