-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
Experimental: use cargo-batch
to reduce CI build times
#244
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
playfulFence
wants to merge
11
commits into
esp-rs:main
Choose a base branch
from
playfulFence:main
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+658
−70
Draft
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
dde8655
do you work?
playfulFence 6254f9e
no mac for peasants
playfulFence 886d8bf
experimental: always build with `alloc`
playfulFence 1786c54
this is terrible, don't look here, I just want to test it
playfulFence 92be58c
go nuts
playfulFence c56ed45
single batch
playfulFence 742171a
sure
playfulFence 968e7f3
now what?
playfulFence be1239e
skip clippy build
playfulFence 1dcb000
will work now
playfulFence 745dc94
linker args
playfulFence File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We shouldn't do this on the normal runners, the xtask should detect if cargo-batch is present and fall back to individual cargo commands otherwise, just like we do for esp-hal. forcing cargo-batch is not the best idea (what if you simply don't want it on your PC, or what if your antivirus decides to remove it suddenly?), we have the code to somewhat smartly generate the commands.