Skip to content

Conversation

@facelessuser
Copy link
Owner

Resolves #485

@gir-bot gir-bot added S: needs-review Needs to be reviewed and/or approved. C: source Related to source code. labels Aug 23, 2025
@facelessuser facelessuser force-pushed the feature/scam branch 2 times, most recently from 00bead4 to 190e545 Compare August 23, 2025 16:35
@gir-bot gir-bot added the C: docs Related to documentation. label Aug 23, 2025
@facelessuser facelessuser force-pushed the feature/scam branch 2 times, most recently from ae2320e to d7f4b26 Compare August 28, 2025 18:33
@facelessuser facelessuser force-pushed the feature/scam branch 2 times, most recently from ec3abf8 to 5f6cd4c Compare December 2, 2025 19:24
Resolves #485
There were two contradictory values used in the sCAM paper. We used the
one that matched colour science, but now there was a correction that
clarifies that `0.1`, not `0.46`, is correct.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

C: docs Related to documentation. C: source Related to source code. S: needs-review Needs to be reviewed and/or approved.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

sCAM color model

3 participants