Skip to content

Conversation

Manciukic
Copy link
Contributor

Changes

The fuzzer caught an issue with the sum of the memory region lengths that could lead to an overflow as there is no check. Replace the sum with a try_fold to also check for overflow.

Reason

Fuzzer went grrr.

License Acceptance

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under
the terms of the Apache 2.0 license. For more information on following Developer
Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check
CONTRIBUTING.md.

PR Checklist

  • I have read and understand CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • I have run tools/devtool checkbuild --all to verify that the PR passes
    build checks on all supported architectures.
  • I have run tools/devtool checkstyle to verify that the PR passes the
    automated style checks.
  • I have described what is done in these changes, why they are needed, and
    how they are solving the problem in a clear and encompassing way.
  • I have updated any relevant documentation (both in code and in the docs)
    in the PR.
  • I have mentioned all user-facing changes in CHANGELOG.md.
  • If a specific issue led to this PR, this PR closes the issue.
  • When making API changes, I have followed the
    Runbook for Firecracker API changes.
  • I have tested all new and changed functionalities in unit tests and/or
    integration tests.
  • I have linked an issue to every new TODO.

  • This functionality cannot be added in rust-vmm.

The fuzzer caught an issue with the sum of the memory region lengths
that could lead to an overflow as there is no check. Replace the sum
with a try_fold to also check for overflow.

Signed-off-by: Riccardo Mancini <[email protected]>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 16, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 82.73%. Comparing base (8f3d17a) to head (72712d3).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5482   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.73%   82.73%           
=======================================
  Files         269      269           
  Lines       27795    27798    +3     
=======================================
+ Hits        22997    23000    +3     
  Misses       4798     4798           
Flag Coverage Δ
5.10-m5n.metal 82.90% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m6a.metal 82.16% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m6g.metal 79.56% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m6i.metal 82.89% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m7a.metal-48xl 82.15% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m7g.metal 79.56% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m7i.metal-24xl 82.87% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m7i.metal-48xl 82.87% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m8g.metal-24xl 79.56% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m8g.metal-48xl 79.56% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
6.1-m5n.metal 82.92% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
6.1-m6a.metal 82.19% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
6.1-m6g.metal 79.56% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
6.1-m6i.metal 82.92% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
6.1-m7a.metal-48xl 82.18% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
6.1-m7g.metal 79.56% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
6.1-m7i.metal-24xl 82.94% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
6.1-m7i.metal-48xl 82.94% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
6.1-m8g.metal-24xl 79.56% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
6.1-m8g.metal-48xl 79.56% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@Manciukic Manciukic marked this pull request as ready for review October 16, 2025 14:27
@Manciukic Manciukic added the Status: Awaiting review Indicates that a pull request is ready to be reviewed label Oct 16, 2025
@Manciukic Manciukic enabled auto-merge (rebase) October 16, 2025 15:03
@Manciukic Manciukic merged commit 837c2e7 into firecracker-microvm:main Oct 16, 2025
8 checks passed
@Manciukic Manciukic deleted the fix-overflow branch October 16, 2025 15:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Status: Awaiting review Indicates that a pull request is ready to be reviewed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants