Update Docker CI tags to 20260209-a2d3b39#2528
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @flashinfer-bot, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request systematically updates the continuous integration (CI) Docker image tags across multiple configurations. This ensures that all CI pipelines utilize the most current and consistent build environments, thereby enhancing the reliability and reproducibility of automated tests and builds. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughDocker image tag versions in CI configuration updated from Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request, which appears to be auto-generated, updates the Docker CI image tags to a new version across four different CUDA environments. The change is straightforward and correct. I have one suggestion to improve the maintainability of the ci/docker-tags.yml file by reducing redundancy. Structuring the file to avoid repeating the same tag would make future updates, especially manual ones, less error-prone.
| flashinfer/flashinfer-ci-cu126: 20260209-a2d3b39 | ||
| flashinfer/flashinfer-ci-cu128: 20260209-a2d3b39 | ||
| flashinfer/flashinfer-ci-cu129: 20260209-a2d3b39 | ||
| flashinfer/flashinfer-ci-cu130: 20260209-a2d3b39 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
To improve maintainability and reduce redundancy, consider refactoring this file to define the Docker tag once and reuse it. Since the tag is the same for all images, you can use a YAML anchor if this file is consumed by a standard YAML parser. This would make it easier to update the tag in the future and prevent potential inconsistencies.
For example:
tag: &tag 20260209-a2d3b39
flashinfer/flashinfer-ci-cu126: *tag
flashinfer/flashinfer-ci-cu128: *tag
flashinfer/flashinfer-ci-cu129: *tag
flashinfer/flashinfer-ci-cu130: *tagIf a custom script parses this file, you might consider refactoring the script and this file to source the tag from a single variable. This would make the process of updating tags more robust.
|
@flashinfer-bot run |
This PR updates the Docker CI image tags to the latest version:
20260209-a2d3b39Updated images:
Auto-generated by release-ci-docker workflow
Summary by CodeRabbit