Skip to content

Update Docker CI tags to 20260209-a2d3b39#2528

Merged
yzh119 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
update-docker-tags-20260209-a2d3b39
Feb 16, 2026
Merged

Update Docker CI tags to 20260209-a2d3b39#2528
yzh119 merged 1 commit intomainfrom
update-docker-tags-20260209-a2d3b39

Conversation

@flashinfer-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@flashinfer-bot flashinfer-bot commented Feb 9, 2026

This PR updates the Docker CI image tags to the latest version: 20260209-a2d3b39

Updated images:

  • flashinfer/flashinfer-ci-cu126:20260209-a2d3b39
  • flashinfer/flashinfer-ci-cu128:20260209-a2d3b39
  • flashinfer/flashinfer-ci-cu129:20260209-a2d3b39
  • flashinfer/flashinfer-ci-cu130:20260209-a2d3b39

Auto-generated by release-ci-docker workflow

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated Docker image tags used in the continuous integration pipeline.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @flashinfer-bot, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request systematically updates the continuous integration (CI) Docker image tags across multiple configurations. This ensures that all CI pipelines utilize the most current and consistent build environments, thereby enhancing the reliability and reproducibility of automated tests and builds.

Highlights

  • Docker CI Image Tags: Updated the Docker CI image tags for flashinfer/flashinfer-ci-cu126, flashinfer/flashinfer-ci-cu128, flashinfer/flashinfer-ci-cu129, and flashinfer/flashinfer-ci-cu130 to the latest version 20260209-a2d3b39.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog
  • ci/docker-tags.yml
    • Updated the Docker image tags for all listed flashinfer-ci-cu images to 20260209-a2d3b39.
Activity
  • This pull request was automatically generated by the release-ci-docker workflow.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 9, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Docker image tag versions in CI configuration updated from 20260203-9b5901e to 20260209-a2d3b39 across four CUDA variant images (cu126, cu128, cu129, cu130) in the docker tags manifest file.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
CI Docker Configuration
ci/docker-tags.yml
Updated four flashinfer-ci Docker image tags (cu126, cu128, cu129, cu130) from version 20260203-9b5901e to 20260209-a2d3b39.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • cyx-6
  • nvmbreughe
  • yzh119

Poem

🐰 Four images bump their tags today,
From old hashes to new they sway,
Cu-one-two-six, one-two-eight, nine, zero too,
Docker versions fresh and true! 📦✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1
❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ❓ Inconclusive The description provides the specific Docker tags updated and their new version, but does not follow the provided template structure with required sections. Consider following the PR template by adding a Description section explaining why tags were updated, and explicitly checking the pre-commit and test checklist items.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately and concisely describes the main change: updating Docker CI tags to a specific version.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch update-docker-tags-20260209-a2d3b39

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request, which appears to be auto-generated, updates the Docker CI image tags to a new version across four different CUDA environments. The change is straightforward and correct. I have one suggestion to improve the maintainability of the ci/docker-tags.yml file by reducing redundancy. Structuring the file to avoid repeating the same tag would make future updates, especially manual ones, less error-prone.

Comment on lines +1 to +4
flashinfer/flashinfer-ci-cu126: 20260209-a2d3b39
flashinfer/flashinfer-ci-cu128: 20260209-a2d3b39
flashinfer/flashinfer-ci-cu129: 20260209-a2d3b39
flashinfer/flashinfer-ci-cu130: 20260209-a2d3b39
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

To improve maintainability and reduce redundancy, consider refactoring this file to define the Docker tag once and reuse it. Since the tag is the same for all images, you can use a YAML anchor if this file is consumed by a standard YAML parser. This would make it easier to update the tag in the future and prevent potential inconsistencies.

For example:

tag: &tag 20260209-a2d3b39
flashinfer/flashinfer-ci-cu126: *tag
flashinfer/flashinfer-ci-cu128: *tag
flashinfer/flashinfer-ci-cu129: *tag
flashinfer/flashinfer-ci-cu130: *tag

If a custom script parses this file, you might consider refactoring the script and this file to source the tag from a single variable. This would make the process of updating tags more robust.

@yzh119 yzh119 enabled auto-merge (squash) February 16, 2026 04:16
@yzh119
Copy link
Collaborator

yzh119 commented Feb 16, 2026

@flashinfer-bot run

@yzh119 yzh119 merged commit a2d6d49 into main Feb 16, 2026
37 of 42 checks passed
@yzh119 yzh119 deleted the update-docker-tags-20260209-a2d3b39 branch February 16, 2026 21:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants