fix(litellm): Classify embeddings correctly #4918
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
sentrivana
approved these changes
Oct 15, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Issues
Check the
call_typevalue to distinguish embeddings from chats. Theclientdecorator setscall_typeby introspecting the function name and wraps all of the top-levellitellmfunctions. If users import fromlitellm.llms, embedding calls still may appear as chats, but the input callback we provide does not have enough information in that case.https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm/blob/2ea7005c40011cef08895e62f4f9f40ce4b75664/litellm/utils.py#L1070-L1078
Closes #4908
Reminders
tox -e linters.feat:,fix:,ref:,meta:)