How to Solve the Issue of Continuous Control in a Robotic Hand with MuJoCo #1949
Unanswered
binbinbai
asked this question in
Asking for Help
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Hello! Can you explain a bit better the discrepancy you observe between the two cases? The actual hand shape looks similar, it just seems to be offset. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi,
I'm a student and I'm trying to use MuJoCo for a robotic hand grasping task .
For this robotic hand grasping task that involves a sequence of joint angles q_tar with a length of 100, where each frame represents the desired target joint angles (including 3 translational and 3 rotational joints), I encountered an issue during the control process.When I use
the grasping sequence is accurate,the manipulator can grasp object visually.
However, this approach does not account for collisions or other physical interactions, so the object is not actually grasped. To achieve an actual grasp, I then used
but I found that this control method resulted in significant discrepancies.
Here is my actuator configuration:
It's important to note that the joint angle differences between consecutive frames in the q_tar sequence are not uniform, with differences ranging from 0.001 to 0.1. I think that when the difference between consecutive frames is very small (0.001), the resulting control signal is also very small, making it difficult to achieve precise control.
How can I solve this issue of continuous control?
If frame-by-frame control is difficult to achieve, is there a feasible method to smoothly move the robotic hand to the joint angles of the last frame, only ensuring that the final frame's joint angles are accurate?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions