Replies: 2 comments
-
I don't think anyone has tried the combination of flexcomp and fluid forces... Looking at your last image, I see lots of transverse boxes that would not give you the aerodynamic profile you need for gliding. I would probably start with a much simpler model with one or two geoms for wings. Maybe what you want is possible, but you'd need to understand how the inertia is computed. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@yuvaltassa Furthermore, do you have any specific insights on fluid dynamics and flexcomps that could help clarify this? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi,
For my master’s thesis, I’m creating a bio-inspired flying squirrel model. I’m using the flexcomp element to simulate the patagium (skin between the limbs). I understand that flexcomp relies on the inertia model for the fluid dynamics, where each point in the flexcomp has its own inertia box.
My question is: How is the total inertia calculated for the entire flexcomp? Does every inertia box always contribute, or can some be blocked by others?
I ask because, in my simulation, the model reaches the ground in roughly the same time whether it falls horizontally or vertically. I would expect it to descend faster when oriented vertically. Or could it have to do with overlapping inertia boxes.
horizontal_fall_visualization.webm
vertical_fall_visualization.webm
vertical_fall_no_patagium_visualization.webm
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions