Skip to content

Conversation

@saifsultanc
Copy link
Contributor

Context

⛑️ Ticket(s): https://secure.helpscout.net/conversation/2897379455/81715

Summary

When using the Dynamically Set Entry Min/Max From Field Value snippet, the Nested Form shows "maximum number reached" before any child entry is even added.

The key issue was default-ing to a zero max value.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 4, 2025

Walkthrough

This change updates the logic within the output_script method of the GP_Nested_Forms_Dynamic_Entry_Min_Max class. The function now checks if the parsed integer value from the maximum field input is not a number using isNaN(). If the check passes, it returns Infinity; otherwise, it returns the parsed value if truthy or falls back to self.defaultMax. There are no changes to any exported or public entities.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
gp-nested-forms/.../gpnf-limit-entry-min-max-from-field.php Modified the return value logic in the output_script method to check for isNaN(value). Returns Infinity for invalid numbers, otherwise returns the parsed value or self.defaultMax if falsey.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant C as Caller (output_script)
    participant F as EntryLimitFunction

    C->>F: Call output_script() with max field input
    F->>F: Parse the input to a numeric value
    F->>F: Check using isNaN(value)
    alt Parsed value is not a number
        F->>C: Return Infinity
    else Parsed value is a valid number
        F->>F: Check if value is truthy
        alt Value is truthy
            F->>C: Return parsed value
        else
            F->>C: Return self.defaultMax
        end
    end
Loading
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 4, 2025

Warnings
⚠️ When ready, don't forget to request reviews on this pull request from your fellow wizards.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against 4e4036b

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1298ead and 4e4036b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • gp-nested-forms/gpnf-limit-entry-min-max-from-field.php (1 hunks)

var value = parseInt($maxField.val());

return value ? value : self.defaultMax;
return isNaN(value) ? Infinity : (value || self.defaultMax);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Logic improvement to prevent premature "maximum number reached" message.

The change correctly addresses the issue by checking if the parsed value is not a number (NaN) and returning Infinity in that case. This prevents the system from incorrectly defaulting to a maximum of 0 when the max field is empty, allowing users to add entries without encountering the premature "maximum number reached" message.

This fix resolves the critical issue described in the PR where users couldn't add child entries because the system was incorrectly displaying the maximum limit message when the form loaded.

Copy link
Contributor

@veryspry veryspry left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like it!

@saifsultanc saifsultanc merged commit 6cc0ab7 into master Apr 7, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
@saifsultanc saifsultanc deleted the saif/fix/81715-default-problem branch April 7, 2025 11:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants