feat: allow searching apporders and datasetorders by asset owner

[PierreJeanjacquot]

overloaded fetchAppOrderbook and fetchDatasetOrderbook methods:

• the first mandatory param (asset address) should be substituted by the option object; either the asset address (previous first param) or the owner address must be specified.
• previous API is deprecated but still works for backward compatibility

[github-actions]

🐳 Hadolint Dockerfile Lint Results

Click to expand detailed results

Dockerfile:17 DL3016 warning: Pin versions in npm. Instead of `npm install <package>` use `npm install <package>@<version>`

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR refactors the orderbook API to allow searching by asset owner while maintaining backward compatibility. The API changes from passing the asset address as the first parameter to accepting an options object that can contain either the asset address or the owner address.

• Added support for searching app/dataset orders by owner address (appOwner/datasetOwner parameters)
• Refactored function signatures to accept options object as first parameter instead of asset address
• Maintained backward compatibility with deprecation warnings for the old API

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 6 out of 7 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
src/common/market/orderbook.js	Core implementation refactoring to support new options object parameter and owner-based searching
src/lib/IExecOrderbookModule.js	Updated method signatures to match new parameter structure
src/cli/cmd/iexec-orderbook.js	Updated CLI commands to use new options object format
src/cli/cmd/iexec-app.js	Updated app CLI commands to use new options object format
test/lib/e2e/IExecOrderbookModule.test.js	Updated tests to use new API and added tests for owner-based searching
docs/classes/IExecOrderbookModule.md	Updated documentation to reflect new API signature and deprecation notices

---

_{Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.}

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
43.0% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)
12.4% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 3%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[Le-Caignec]

Some comments for consistency between function signatures.