Skip to content

Conversation

@aarongreig
Copy link
Contributor

With this change all experimental features now add a ur_device_info_t enum which adapters report support through, and all EXTENSION_STRING macros have been removed.

With this change all experimental features now add a ur_device_info_t
enum which adapters report support through, and all EXTENSION_STRING
macros have been removed.
@aarongreig
Copy link
Contributor Author

UR changes ported from oneapi-src/unified-runtime#2304

@aarongreig aarongreig marked this pull request as ready for review February 24, 2025 15:02
@aarongreig aarongreig requested review from a team as code owners February 24, 2025 15:02
Copy link
Contributor

@frasercrmck frasercrmck left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CUDA UR LGTM (already approved older PR)

Copy link
Contributor

@steffenlarsen steffenlarsen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Copy link
Contributor

@Bensuo Bensuo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Commad-buffer changes LGTM!

ur_exp_command_buffer is also present in the UR mock adapter in the SYCL unit tests

"cl_khr_fp64 cl_khr_fp16 cl_khr_il_program ur_exp_command_buffer";

I don't think it's used anywhere, could you remove that as well?

@aarongreig aarongreig requested a review from a team as a code owner February 26, 2025 10:53
@aarongreig aarongreig requested a review from againull February 26, 2025 10:53
Copy link
Contributor

@kbenzie kbenzie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, source needs to be regenerated to resolve the conflicts

@aarongreig
Copy link
Contributor Author

@intel/llvm-gatekeepers please merge

@dm-vodopyanov dm-vodopyanov merged commit 607dff4 into intel:sycl Mar 6, 2025
29 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants