-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
Use underlay prefix and two harcoded bytes for traffic isolation #709
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
a79536f to
f482881
Compare
47267ce to
256c6b4
Compare
|
The changes passed the benchmark tests on our lab machines, both the offloading and non-offloading mode. |
PlagueCZ
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Small details found.
Also I would like to discuss the prefix idea
a63bb86 to
315d2ea
Compare
5bfded9 to
c30b16d
Compare
|
I finished the needed changes, moved to range Code is much simpler everywhere now. I documented my prefix schema in I tested on pytest with HW (mellanox) tests, and also deployed in OSC, both normal and multiport setup, i.e. both sync and async rules are fully tested and working fine. I believe Florin will be testing the running of a separate IPIP tunnel in parallel to dpservice on Monday. I also moved |
|
Florin confirmed that independent IPIP traffic is now able to work alongside dpservice. This is on async multiport eswitch setup. |
Do not isolate only the ip in ipv6 encapsulated packets but also the specific subnet used by dpservice on a given node. Signed-off-by: Guvenc Gulce <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Guvenc Gulce <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Guvenc Gulce <[email protected]>
c30b16d to
f219b2f
Compare
|
LGTM |
Do not isolate only the ip in ipv6 encapsulated packets but also the specific subnet used by dpservice on a given node.