Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
231 changes: 231 additions & 0 deletions .agent-os/specs/2025-08-06-ui-optimization/spec.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,231 @@
# UI Optimization and Layout Improvement

> **Spec ID:** 2025-08-06-ui-optimization
> **Created:** 2025-08-06
> **Status:** Draft
> **Priority:** High
> **Estimated Effort:** Medium (3-5 days)

## Problem Statement

The current ClickIt UI suffers from poor space utilization and requires excessive scrolling to access all functionality. The main interface is constrained to a fixed height of 800px, forcing users to scroll through multiple large card components to access different features.

### Current Issues

1. **Excessive Scrolling**: Users must scroll through a 800px tall window to see all options
2. **Poor Space Utilization**: Large card components with significant padding waste screen real estate
3. **Cognitive Overload**: Too many options visible simultaneously without clear hierarchy
4. **Fixed Layout**: No adaptability to user preferences or screen sizes
5. **Component Bloat**: Some components (PresetSelectionView: 666 lines, PerformanceDashboard: 732 lines) are overly complex

### Impact Analysis

**User Experience Issues:**
- Difficult discovery of features hidden below the fold
- Inefficient workflow requiring constant scrolling
- Overwhelming interface for new users
- Poor accessibility for users with limited screen space

**Technical Debt:**
- Monolithic components that are difficult to maintain
- Poor separation of concerns in UI layout
- Fixed sizing prevents responsive design

## Proposed Solution

### 1. Tabbed Interface Architecture

Replace the current single-scroll layout with a clean tabbed interface that logically groups functionality:

**Tab Structure:**
- **"Quick Start"** - Essential controls only (target selection, basic timing, start/stop)
- **"Settings"** - Advanced timing configuration, hotkeys, visual feedback settings
- **"Presets"** - Complete preset management system
- **"Statistics"** - Performance monitoring, elapsed time, analytics
- **"Advanced"** - Developer tools, debug information, system diagnostics

### 2. Compact Component Design

**Horizontal Layouts:**
- Convert vertical card stacks to horizontal layouts where appropriate
- Use inline controls instead of separate card sections
- Implement collapsible sections for advanced options

**Smart Defaults:**
- Show essential controls by default
- Progressive disclosure for advanced features
- Context-sensitive help and tooltips

### 3. Responsive Window Sizing

**Dynamic Height:**
- Remove fixed 800px height constraint
- Auto-size window based on selected tab content
- Minimum height of 400px, maximum of 600px
- User preference for compact vs. expanded layouts

**Adaptive Layouts:**
- Responsive design principles within each tab
- Flexible component sizing based on window width
- Smart reflow for different aspect ratios

### 4. Streamlined Information Density

**Visual Hierarchy:**
- Clear typography scale with proper information hierarchy
- Reduced padding and margins while maintaining usability
- Strategic use of color and spacing to guide user attention

**Content Optimization:**
- Remove redundant information display
- Consolidate related controls into logical groups
- Use progressive disclosure for complexity management

## Technical Implementation

### 1. New Tab Container Component

```swift
struct TabbedMainView: View {
@State private var selectedTab: MainTab = .quickStart
@EnvironmentObject private var viewModel: ClickItViewModel

var body: some View {
VStack(spacing: 0) {
// Tab bar
TabBarView(selectedTab: $selectedTab)

// Tab content with dynamic sizing
TabContentView(selectedTab: selectedTab, viewModel: viewModel)
.frame(minHeight: 400, maxHeight: 600)
}
.frame(width: 420) // Slightly wider for better proportions
}
}
```

### 2. Component Refactoring Plan

**High-Impact Refactoring:**
1. **PresetSelectionView** → Split into `PresetSelector` + `PresetManager`
2. **PerformanceDashboard** → Separate charts from controls
3. **ConfigurationPanel** → Break into focused sub-components
4. **StatusHeader** → Consolidate with quick controls

**New Compact Components:**
- `QuickControlsView` - Essential start/stop/target selection
- `CompactTimingView` - Inline timing controls
- `StatusBarView` - Minimal status display
- `InlinePresetSelector` - Dropdown-style preset selection

### 3. State Management Optimization

**Tab State:**
- Persistent tab selection across app launches
- Smart tab suggestions based on user workflow
- Tab-specific state preservation

**Layout State:**
- User preference for compact vs. expanded modes
- Window size persistence
- Component visibility preferences

## Success Criteria

### Primary Goals (Must Have)
- [x] **Eliminate Required Scrolling**: All essential functionality visible without scrolling
- [x] **Reduce Cognitive Load**: Clear tab-based organization with logical groupings
- [x] **Improve Discovery**: Important features easily accessible in Quick Start tab
- [x] **Maintain Functionality**: No loss of existing features during reorganization

### Secondary Goals (Should Have)
- [x] **Responsive Design**: Adaptive layouts that work at different window sizes
- [x] **User Preferences**: Customizable layout density and tab preferences
- [x] **Performance**: Improved rendering performance through component optimization
- [x] **Accessibility**: Better keyboard navigation and screen reader support

### Quality Metrics
- **Window Height**: Reduce from fixed 800px to dynamic 400-600px range
- **Time to Essential Features**: < 2 seconds to access any core functionality
- **Component Count**: Reduce main view components from 6+ cards to 3-4 focused areas
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The quality metric for Component Count states 'Reduce main view components from 6+ cards to 3-4 focused areas'. This appears to describe the refactoring of the old UI. For the new tabbed interface, it would be more valuable to define metrics related to the new components, such as the number of components per tab or the complexity of each tab's view, to better align with the new architecture.

- **Code Maintainability**: Break 500+ line components into <200 line focused modules

## Risk Assessment

### Technical Risks
- **State Management Complexity**: Tab-based navigation requires careful state preservation
- **Component Dependencies**: Existing components may have tight coupling requiring refactoring
- **Layout Regression**: Risk of breaking existing layouts on different screen sizes

### User Experience Risks
- **Workflow Disruption**: Users accustomed to current layout may need learning period
- **Feature Discovery**: Important features might be harder to find if poorly categorized
- **Accessibility Impact**: Tab navigation could impact screen reader workflows

### Mitigation Strategies
- **Incremental Migration**: Implement tabs while maintaining backward compatibility option
- **User Testing**: Test with existing users before finalizing tab organization
- **Feature Mapping**: Comprehensive audit of current features to ensure proper placement
- **Accessibility Testing**: Dedicated testing with screen readers and keyboard navigation

## Implementation Plan

### Phase 1: Foundation (Week 1)
- [ ] Create tab container architecture
- [ ] Implement basic tab navigation
- [ ] Create Quick Start tab with essential controls only
- [ ] Migrate existing status and basic controls

### Phase 2: Content Migration (Week 2)
- [ ] Implement remaining tabs (Settings, Presets, Statistics, Advanced)
- [ ] Refactor existing components for new layout constraints
- [ ] Implement dynamic window sizing
- [ ] Add tab state persistence

### Phase 3: Polish & Optimization (Week 3)
- [ ] Component size optimization and code cleanup
- [ ] Responsive design implementation
- [ ] User preference system
- [ ] Accessibility improvements
- [ ] Performance optimization

### Phase 4: Testing & Refinement (Week 4)
- [ ] Comprehensive testing across different screen sizes
- [ ] User workflow validation
- [ ] Performance benchmarking
- [ ] Bug fixes and polish

## Dependencies

- Existing ClickItViewModel state management
- Current component architecture
- SwiftUI TabView or custom tab implementation
- User preferences system (may need creation)

## Success Measurement

**Quantitative Metrics:**
- Window height reduction: 800px → 400-600px (25-50% improvement)
- Component complexity: Average lines per component <300 (currently ~280)
- User task completion time: Measure time to complete common workflows
- Memory usage: Ensure no regression in resource consumption

**Qualitative Feedback:**
- User satisfaction with new layout
- Ease of feature discovery
- Overall workflow efficiency
- Visual design appeal

---

**Next Steps:**
1. Review and approve this specification
2. Create detailed technical implementation plan
3. Set up development environment for UI testing
4. Begin Phase 1 implementation

**Stakeholders:**
- UX/UI Design Lead
- Development Team
- Product Owner
- Beta User Community (for feedback)
Loading
Loading