Skip to content

Conversation

@xrstf
Copy link
Contributor

@xrstf xrstf commented Oct 20, 2025

Summary

It irks me that it's sometimes kcp, sometimes KCP and in extreme cases even Kcp. For no technical reason other than consistency, I vote that we enshrine the correct spelling (all lowercase) in the FAQ and adjust all files accordingly.

This PR also fixes the rebasing docs a bit and adds a note that they are probably severely outdated since we moved to monorepo. The sample screenshot of GitHub is now included as well and shrunk by optipng by nearly 50% :)

I did not touch the boilerplate header as I am not sure about the CNCF rammifications, but I would personally of course also change them. If we can.

What Type of PR Is This?

/kind cleanup

Release Notes

NONE

@kcp-ci-bot kcp-ci-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the DCO. area/cli Issues or PRs related to CLI changes size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. kind/api-change Categorizes issue or PR as related to adding, removing, or otherwise changing an API labels Oct 20, 2025
@kcp-ci-bot kcp-ci-bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 20, 2025
@kcp-ci-bot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: d9923af3dfee347737df83329aef52217b7d40d5

@kcp-ci-bot kcp-ci-bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 20, 2025
@kcp-ci-bot
Copy link
Contributor

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@xrstf
Copy link
Contributor Author

xrstf commented Oct 20, 2025

/retest


## What does kcp stand for / how to spell it?

`kcp` stands for "Kube for Control Plane" and should always be written in lowercase letters.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Afaik our official position is that it doesn't stand for anything.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I also remember someone telling me that kcp effectively stands for nothing and CERTAINLY NOT "Kubernetes control plane", but since then I heard many folks use the "kube for control plane" mantra.

No real opinion on my side.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would vote for kcp - Kubernetes-like Control Planes. This was clicked in my head for a long time.
I leave the final vote for @sttts :)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 for @mjudeikis's proposal.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"kcp - Kcp Control Plane" 😬

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"K-ControlPlane"

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can agree with MJ's earlier proposal ("kcp - Kubernetes-like Control Planes") if CNCF allows it.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we check with cncf?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I checked with CNCF folks and the inofficial statement through the grapevines was:

  • [this decision] should not need CNCF approval
  • [kcp devs] must just make sure to follow kcp governance

Copy link
Contributor

@mjudeikis mjudeikis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just close the one pending and merge

Short: "kubectl plugin for kcp",
Long: help.Doc(`
KCP is the easiest way to manage Kubernetes applications against one or
kcp is the easiest way to manage Kubernetes applications against one or
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we remove this Kubernetes applications against. Applications are confusing.

ALl thi section is somehow wrong.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I replaced it with the current short intro we have in our Readme/docs.


## What does kcp stand for / how to spell it?

`kcp` stands for "Kube for Control Plane" and should always be written in lowercase letters.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would vote for kcp - Kubernetes-like Control Planes. This was clicked in my head for a long time.
I leave the final vote for @sttts :)

@kcp-ci-bot kcp-ci-bot added size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 27, 2025
@kcp-ci-bot kcp-ci-bot added needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. and removed needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Oct 28, 2025
@kcp-ci-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from embik. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@kcp-ci-bot kcp-ci-bot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 4, 2025
@kcp-ci-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@xrstf: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-kcp-build-image 47233a3 link true /test pull-kcp-build-image
pull-kcp-test-unit 47233a3 link true /test pull-kcp-test-unit
pull-kcp-lint 47233a3 link true /test pull-kcp-lint
pull-kcp-test-e2e-shared 47233a3 link true /test pull-kcp-test-e2e-shared
pull-kcp-test-e2e-sharded 47233a3 link true /test pull-kcp-test-e2e-sharded

Full PR test history

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@kcp-ci-bot kcp-ci-bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 5, 2025
@kcp-ci-bot
Copy link
Contributor

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/cli Issues or PRs related to CLI changes dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the DCO. kind/api-change Categorizes issue or PR as related to adding, removing, or otherwise changing an API kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants