-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 424
Fix kcp casing once and for all #3665
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -38,17 +38,17 @@ import ( | |
| func KubectlKcpCommand() *cobra.Command { | ||
| root := &cobra.Command{ | ||
| Use: "kcp", | ||
| Short: "kubectl plugin for KCP", | ||
| Short: "kubectl plugin for kcp", | ||
| Long: help.Doc(` | ||
| KCP is the easiest way to manage Kubernetes applications against one or | ||
| kcp is the easiest way to manage Kubernetes applications against one or | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. can we remove this ALl thi section is somehow wrong. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I replaced it with the current short intro we have in our Readme/docs. |
||
| more clusters, by giving you a personal control plane that schedules your | ||
| workloads onto one or many clusters, and making it simple to pick up and | ||
| move. Advanced use cases including spreading your apps across clusters for | ||
| resiliency, scheduling batch workloads onto clusters with free capacity, | ||
| and enabling collaboration for individual teams without having access to | ||
| the underlying clusters. | ||
|
|
||
| This command provides KCP specific sub-command for kubectl. | ||
| This command provides kcp-specific sub-command for kubectl. | ||
| `), | ||
| SilenceUsage: true, | ||
| SilenceErrors: true, | ||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Afaik our official position is that it doesn't stand for anything.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought so too, but then I found https://github.com/kcp-dev/kcp/blob/main/cmd/kcp/kcp.go#L51.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I also remember someone telling me that kcp effectively stands for nothing and CERTAINLY NOT "Kubernetes control plane", but since then I heard many folks use the "kube for control plane" mantra.
No real opinion on my side.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would vote for
kcp - Kubernetes-like Control Planes. This was clicked in my head for a long time.I leave the final vote for @sttts :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1 for @mjudeikis's proposal.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"kcp - Kcp Control Plane" 😬
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"K-ControlPlane"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can agree with MJ's earlier proposal ("kcp - Kubernetes-like Control Planes") if CNCF allows it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we check with cncf?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I checked with CNCF folks and the inofficial statement through the grapevines was: