-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.7k
[Coverage] Introduce getBranchCounterPair()
. NFC.
#112702
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
fc697f0
[Coverage] Introduce `getBranchCounterPair()`. NFC.
chapuni ad13691
Rewind changes for folding
chapuni 58feee3
Merge branch 'main' into users/chapuni/cov/single/getpair
chapuni ab84f17
Introduce skeleton getSwitchImplicitDefaultCounter()
chapuni 9d3c3b0
Merge branch 'main' into users/chapuni/cov/single/getpair
chapuni dbcf896
getSwitchImplicitDefaultCounterPair
chapuni 19edcd3
Merge branch 'main' into users/chapuni/cov/single/getpair
chapuni 4e41b99
Introduce BranchCounterPair
chapuni d854fb1
Rewind switch DefaultCase. (to #113112)
chapuni bac2967
Enable addCounters
chapuni 6bae87d
Get rid of structual bindings
chapuni c8edf58
Flatten with getBranchCounterPair(SkipCntForOld)
chapuni f2ba219
Update comments
chapuni 97015cb
Decorate the mock
chapuni 9a40d20
Will be pruned after the migration of SingleByte.
chapuni File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it's not immediately obvious what the pair represents from this function name.
getExecutionCountAnd...
?or, make a lightweight POD struct to represent this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like a silly
std::pair
:) Let me think more.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think changing the name is sufficient for making me less confused
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done but I am still dubious namings would be appropriate. Not all users expect
[Exec, Skip]
, but[Exec, Exit]
or similar. Do you have a better idea to resolve namings (not by structural assignments but by name)?