Skip to content

Conversation

@cyndyishida
Copy link
Member

Often, when the CoC investigates incidents, most members are available to discuss & come to a unanimous decision. In the event of an appeal, we agreed that the effective way to investigate would be for the committee to consider evidence that was missed in the initial decision-making. Update the Response guide to reflect this.

Often when the CoC investigates incidents, most members are
available to discuss & come to a unanimous decision. In the event of an
appeal, we agreed the effective way to investigate would be for the commitee
to consider evidence that was missed in the initial decision making.
Update the Response guide to reflect this.
@cyndyishida cyndyishida changed the title [docs][CoC] Update verbage about appeal process [docs][CoC] Update verbiage about appeal process Apr 22, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@AaronBallman AaronBallman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@cyndyishida cyndyishida merged commit a5a6ae1 into llvm:main Apr 22, 2025
11 checks passed
@cyndyishida cyndyishida deleted the eng/PR-UpdatePhrasingCoC branch April 22, 2025 17:27
IanWood1 pushed a commit to IanWood1/llvm-project that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
Often, when the CoC investigates incidents, most members are available
to discuss & come to a unanimous decision. In the event of an appeal, we
agreed that the effective way to investigate would be for the committee
to consider evidence that was missed in the initial decision-making.
Update the Response guide to reflect this.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants