-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.7k
[clang] Inline static helper function in Compilation.cpp
#152875
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project! This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified. If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this page. If this is not working for you, it is probably because you do not have write permissions for the repository. In which case you can instead tag reviewers by name in a comment by using If you have received no comments on your PR for a week, you can request a review by "ping"ing the PR by adding a comment “Ping”. The common courtesy "ping" rate is once a week. Please remember that you are asking for valuable time from other developers. If you have further questions, they may be answered by the LLVM GitHub User Guide. You can also ask questions in a comment on this PR, on the LLVM Discord or on the forums. |
InputsOk
function in clang/lib/Driver/Compilation.cpp
InputsOk
function in clang/lib/Driver/Compilation.cpp
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver Author: Thibault Monnier (Thibault-Monnier) ChangesThis PR inlines the InputsOk function in clang Compilation.cpp driver, because it was just a simple function call and was called only once. In addition, inlining it allows removing the double negation. Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152875.diff 1 Files Affected:
diff --git a/clang/lib/Driver/Compilation.cpp b/clang/lib/Driver/Compilation.cpp
index a39952e3c280a..4e300316ae9ba 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Driver/Compilation.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Driver/Compilation.cpp
@@ -232,11 +232,6 @@ static bool ActionFailed(const Action *A,
return false;
}
-static bool InputsOk(const Command &C,
- const FailingCommandList &FailingCommands) {
- return !ActionFailed(&C.getSource(), FailingCommands);
-}
-
void Compilation::ExecuteJobs(const JobList &Jobs,
FailingCommandList &FailingCommands,
bool LogOnly) const {
@@ -245,7 +240,7 @@ void Compilation::ExecuteJobs(const JobList &Jobs,
// In all but CLMode, execute all the jobs unless the necessary inputs for the
// job is missing due to previous failures.
for (const auto &Job : Jobs) {
- if (!InputsOk(Job, FailingCommands))
+ if (ActionFailed(&Job.getSource(), FailingCommands))
continue;
const Command *FailingCommand = nullptr;
if (int Res = ExecuteCommand(Job, FailingCommand, LogOnly)) {
|
InputsOk
function in clang/lib/Driver/Compilation.cpp
clang/lib/Driver/Compilation.cpp
clang/lib/Driver/Compilation.cpp
Compilation.cpp
Compilation.cpp
Compilation.cpp
Hey, this is my first PR on the llvm-project. I hope it respects the llvm contribution guidelines. Feedback is welcome. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, that function really doesn’t need to exist
@Sirraide, I do not really know who I should ping to review. Could you please help? Thanks! |
I’ll merge it once CI is done w/ it (feel free to ping me again should I forget about it) |
@Thibault-Monnier Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the LLVM Project! Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then tested by our build bots. If there is a problem with a build, you may receive a report in an email or a comment on this PR. Please check whether problems have been caused by your change specifically, as the builds can include changes from many authors. It is not uncommon for your change to be included in a build that fails due to someone else's changes, or infrastructure issues. How to do this, and the rest of the post-merge process, is covered in detail here. If your change does cause a problem, it may be reverted, or you can revert it yourself. This is a normal part of LLVM development. You can fix your changes and open a new PR to merge them again. If you don't get any reports, no action is required from you. Your changes are working as expected, well done! |
This PR inlines the static
InputsOk
function in clangCompilation.cpp
driver, because it was just a simple function call and was called only once. In addition, inlining it allows removing the double negation.