- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 15k
[RegAlloc] Add coverage leading to revert of pr160765 #161614
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Merged
      
      
    
                
     Merged
            
            
          Conversation
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
    Essentially what happened is the following series of events: 1) We rematerialized the vmv.v.x into the loop. 2) As this was the last use of the instruction, we deleted the instruction, and removed it from the original live range. 3) We split the live range for the remat. 4) We tried to rematerialize the uses of that split interval, and crashed because the assert about the def being available in the original live interval does not hold.
| @llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-risc-v Author: Philip Reames (preames) ChangesEssentially what happened is the following series of events: 
 Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/161614.diff 1 Files Affected: 
 diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/rvv/remat.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/rvv/remat.ll
index 06d54fadaeffd..95bff27fe8ca6 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/rvv/remat.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/rvv/remat.ll
@@ -301,3 +301,135 @@ define void @vfmv.s.f(ptr %p, double %x) {
   store volatile double %x, ptr %p
   ret void
 }
+
+; This test is fairly fragile, but it's trying to cover the case which
+; caused the revert of bba9172 due to interaction with how rematerialize
+; instructions are pruned from the original live interval.  In the result
+; below, we remat the vmv.v.x into the loop, but fail to remat the vmv.v.x
+; a second time after further splitting it's live range.  We shouldn't need
+; to spill it to the stack at all.
+define i64 @dual_remat(i64 %0, <vscale x 16 x i64> %1, <vscale x 16 x i64> %2, ptr %p) #0 {
+; CHECK-LABEL: dual_remat:
+; CHECK:       # %bb.0: # %entry
+; CHECK-NEXT:    addi sp, sp, -16
+; CHECK-NEXT:    .cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
+; CHECK-NEXT:    csrr a1, vlenb
+; CHECK-NEXT:    slli a2, a1, 5
+; CHECK-NEXT:    add a1, a2, a1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    sub sp, sp, a1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    .cfi_escape 0x0f, 0x0d, 0x72, 0x00, 0x11, 0x10, 0x22, 0x11, 0x21, 0x92, 0xa2, 0x38, 0x00, 0x1e, 0x22 # sp + 16 + 33 * vlenb
+; CHECK-NEXT:    csrr a1, vlenb
+; CHECK-NEXT:    slli a1, a1, 3
+; CHECK-NEXT:    add a1, sp, a1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    addi a1, a1, 16
+; CHECK-NEXT:    vs8r.v v16, (a1) # vscale x 64-byte Folded Spill
+; CHECK-NEXT:    addi a1, sp, 16
+; CHECK-NEXT:    vs8r.v v8, (a1) # vscale x 64-byte Folded Spill
+; CHECK-NEXT:    vsetvli a1, zero, e64, m8, ta, ma
+; CHECK-NEXT:    vmv.v.i v16, 0
+; CHECK-NEXT:    csrr a2, vlenb
+; CHECK-NEXT:    srli a1, a2, 3
+; CHECK-NEXT:    slli a2, a2, 3
+; CHECK-NEXT:    add a2, a3, a2
+; CHECK-NEXT:    vmv.v.i v0, 0
+; CHECK-NEXT:  .LBB8_1: # %vector.body
+; CHECK-NEXT:    # =>This Inner Loop Header: Depth=1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    csrr a4, vlenb
+; CHECK-NEXT:    mv a5, a4
+; CHECK-NEXT:    slli a4, a4, 3
+; CHECK-NEXT:    add a5, a5, a4
+; CHECK-NEXT:    slli a4, a4, 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    add a4, a4, a5
+; CHECK-NEXT:    add a4, sp, a4
+; CHECK-NEXT:    addi a4, a4, 16
+; CHECK-NEXT:    vs8r.v v16, (a4) # vscale x 64-byte Folded Spill
+; CHECK-NEXT:    vmv.v.x v8, a0
+; CHECK-NEXT:    csrr a4, vlenb
+; CHECK-NEXT:    slli a5, a4, 4
+; CHECK-NEXT:    add a4, a5, a4
+; CHECK-NEXT:    add a4, sp, a4
+; CHECK-NEXT:    addi a4, a4, 16
+; CHECK-NEXT:    vs8r.v v8, (a4) # vscale x 64-byte Folded Spill
+; CHECK-NEXT:    csrr a4, vlenb
+; CHECK-NEXT:    mv a5, a4
+; CHECK-NEXT:    slli a4, a4, 3
+; CHECK-NEXT:    add a5, a5, a4
+; CHECK-NEXT:    slli a4, a4, 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    add a4, a4, a5
+; CHECK-NEXT:    add a4, sp, a4
+; CHECK-NEXT:    addi a4, a4, 16
+; CHECK-NEXT:    vl8r.v v16, (a4) # vscale x 64-byte Folded Reload
+; CHECK-NEXT:    vand.vv v16, v16, v8
+; CHECK-NEXT:    vmsne.vi v24, v16, 0
+; CHECK-NEXT:    csrr a4, vlenb
+; CHECK-NEXT:    slli a4, a4, 4
+; CHECK-NEXT:    add a4, sp, a4
+; CHECK-NEXT:    addi a4, a4, 16
+; CHECK-NEXT:    vs1r.v v24, (a4) # vscale x 8-byte Folded Spill
+; CHECK-NEXT:    vand.vv v16, v0, v8
+; CHECK-NEXT:    vmsne.vi v8, v16, 0
+; CHECK-NEXT:    csrr a4, vlenb
+; CHECK-NEXT:    mv a5, a4
+; CHECK-NEXT:    slli a4, a4, 3
+; CHECK-NEXT:    add a5, a5, a4
+; CHECK-NEXT:    slli a4, a4, 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    add a4, a4, a5
+; CHECK-NEXT:    add a4, sp, a4
+; CHECK-NEXT:    addi a4, a4, 16
+; CHECK-NEXT:    vl8r.v v16, (a4) # vscale x 64-byte Folded Reload
+; CHECK-NEXT:    csrr a4, vlenb
+; CHECK-NEXT:    slli a4, a4, 4
+; CHECK-NEXT:    add a4, sp, a4
+; CHECK-NEXT:    addi a4, a4, 16
+; CHECK-NEXT:    vl1r.v v9, (a4) # vscale x 8-byte Folded Reload
+; CHECK-NEXT:    vsetvli a4, zero, e8, mf4, ta, ma
+; CHECK-NEXT:    vslideup.vx v9, v8, a1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    vsetvli a4, zero, e8, m2, ta, ma
+; CHECK-NEXT:    vcpop.m a4, v9
+; CHECK-NEXT:    csrr a5, vlenb
+; CHECK-NEXT:    slli a6, a5, 4
+; CHECK-NEXT:    add a5, a6, a5
+; CHECK-NEXT:    add a5, sp, a5
+; CHECK-NEXT:    addi a5, a5, 16
+; CHECK-NEXT:    vl8r.v v8, (a5) # vscale x 64-byte Folded Reload
+; CHECK-NEXT:    vs8r.v v8, (a3)
+; CHECK-NEXT:    vs8r.v v8, (a2)
+; CHECK-NEXT:    addi a5, sp, 16
+; CHECK-NEXT:    vl8r.v v8, (a5) # vscale x 64-byte Folded Reload
+; CHECK-NEXT:    vsetvli a5, zero, e64, m8, ta, ma
+; CHECK-NEXT:    vor.vv v16, v16, v8
+; CHECK-NEXT:    csrr a5, vlenb
+; CHECK-NEXT:    slli a5, a5, 3
+; CHECK-NEXT:    add a5, sp, a5
+; CHECK-NEXT:    addi a5, a5, 16
+; CHECK-NEXT:    vl8r.v v8, (a5) # vscale x 64-byte Folded Reload
+; CHECK-NEXT:    vor.vv v0, v0, v8
+; CHECK-NEXT:    beqz a4, .LBB8_1
+; CHECK-NEXT:  # %bb.2: # %middle.block
+; CHECK-NEXT:    andi a0, a0, 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    csrr a1, vlenb
+; CHECK-NEXT:    slli a2, a1, 5
+; CHECK-NEXT:    add a1, a2, a1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    add sp, sp, a1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    .cfi_def_cfa sp, 16
+; CHECK-NEXT:    addi sp, sp, 16
+; CHECK-NEXT:    .cfi_def_cfa_offset 0
+; CHECK-NEXT:    ret
+entry:
+  %broadcast.splatinsert = insertelement <vscale x 16 x i64> zeroinitializer, i64 %0, i64 0
+  %broadcast.splat = shufflevector <vscale x 16 x i64> %broadcast.splatinsert, <vscale x 16 x i64> zeroinitializer, <vscale x 16 x i32> zeroinitializer
+  br label %vector.body
+
+vector.body:                                      ; preds = %vector.body, %entry
+  %vec.ind = phi <vscale x 16 x i64> [ zeroinitializer, %entry ], [ %vec.ind.next, %vector.body ]
+  %3 = and <vscale x 16 x i64> %vec.ind, %broadcast.splat
+  %4 = icmp ne <vscale x 16 x i64> %3, zeroinitializer
+  store <vscale x 16 x i64> %broadcast.splat, ptr %p
+  %5 = tail call i1 @llvm.vector.reduce.or.nxv16i1(<vscale x 16 x i1> %4)
+  %vec.ind.next = or <vscale x 16 x i64> %vec.ind, %1
+  br i1 %5, label %middle.block, label %vector.body
+
+middle.block:                                     ; preds = %vector.body
+  %and.i = and i64 1, %0
+  ret i64 %and.i
+}
 | 
              
                    arsenm
  
              
              approved these changes
              
                  
                    Oct 2, 2025 
                  
              
              
            
            
    
  mahesh-attarde 
      pushed a commit
        to mahesh-attarde/llvm-project
      that referenced
      this pull request
    
      Oct 3, 2025 
    
    
      
  
    
      
    
  
Essentially what happened is the following series of events: 1) We rematerialized the vmv.v.x into the loop. 2) As this was the last use of the instruction, we deleted the instruction, and removed it from the original live range. 3) We split the live range for the remat. 4) We tried to rematerialize the uses of that split interval, and crashed because the assert about the def being available in the original live interval does not hold.
  
    Sign up for free
    to join this conversation on GitHub.
    Already have an account?
    Sign in to comment
  
      
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
Essentially what happened is the following series of events:
instruction, and removed it from the original live range.
crashed because the assert about the def being available in
the original live interval does not hold.