[DA] Add tests for nsw doesn't hold on entire iteration space (NFC)

llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/monotonicity-loop-guard.ll

@@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_analyze_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 6
+; RUN: opt < %s -disable-output -passes="print<da>" -da-dump-monotonicity-report \
+; RUN:     -da-enable-monotonicity-check 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+
+; FIXME: These cases are not monotonic because currently we define the domain
+; of monotonicity as "entire iteration space". However, the nsw property is
+; actually valid only under the loop guard conditions.
+
+; for (i = 0; i < INT64_MAX - 1; i++)
+;   if (i < 1000)
+;     for (j = 0; j < 2000; j++)
+;       a[i + j] = 0;
+;
+define void @nsw_under_loop_guard0(ptr %a) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'nsw_under_loop_guard0'
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Monotonicity check:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    Inst: store i8 0, ptr %idx, align 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:      Expr: {{\{\{}}0,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%loop.i.header>,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%loop.j>
+; CHECK-NEXT:      Monotonicity: MultivariateSignedMonotonic
+; CHECK-EMPTY:
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i8 0, ptr %idx, align 1 --> Dst: store i8 0, ptr %idx, align 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+;
+entry:
+  br label %loop.i.header
+
+loop.i.header:
+  %i = phi i64 [ 0 , %entry ], [ %i.next, %loop.i.latch ]
+  br label %loop.j.pr
+
+loop.j.pr:
+  %guard.j = icmp slt i64 %i, 1000
+  br i1 %guard.j, label %loop.j, label %loop.i.latch
+
+loop.j:
+  %j = phi i64 [ 0, %loop.j.pr ], [ %j.next, %loop.j ]
+  %offset = add nsw i64 %i, %j
+  %idx = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %a, i64 %offset
+  store i8 0, ptr %idx
+  %j.next = add nsw i64 %j, 1
+  %ec.j = icmp eq i64 %j.next, 2000
+  br i1 %ec.j, label %loop.i.latch, label %loop.j
+
+loop.i.latch:
+  %i.next = add nsw i64 %i, 1
+  %ec.i = icmp eq i64 %i.next, 9223372036854775807
+  br i1 %ec.i, label %exit, label %loop.i.header
+
+exit:
+  ret void
+}
+
+; for (i = 0; i < INT64_MAX; i++)
+;   if (100 < i)
+;     for (j = 0; j < 100; j++)
+;       a[INT64_MAX - i + j] = 0;
+;
+define void @nsw_under_loop_guard1(ptr %a) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'nsw_under_loop_guard1'
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Monotonicity check:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    Inst: store i8 0, ptr %idx, align 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:      Expr: {{\{\{}}9223372036854775807,+,-1}<nsw><%loop.i.header>,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%loop.j>
+; CHECK-NEXT:      Monotonicity: MultivariateSignedMonotonic
+; CHECK-EMPTY:
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i8 0, ptr %idx, align 1 --> Dst: store i8 0, ptr %idx, align 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - none!
+;
+entry:
+  br label %loop.i.header
+
+loop.i.header:
+  %i = phi i64 [ 0 , %entry ], [ %i.next, %loop.i.latch ]
+  br label %loop.j.pr
+
+loop.j.pr:
+  %guard.j = icmp sgt i64 %i, 100
+  br i1 %guard.j, label %loop.j, label %exit
+
+loop.j:
+  %j = phi i64 [ 0, %loop.j.pr ], [ %j.next, %loop.j ]
+  %val.0 = sub nsw i64 9223372036854775807, %i
+  %val = add nsw i64 %val.0, %j
+  %idx = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %a, i64 %val
+  store i8 0, ptr %idx
+  %j.next = add nsw i64 %j, 1
+  %ec.j = icmp eq i64 %j.next, 100
+  br i1 %ec.j, label %loop.i.latch, label %loop.j
+
+loop.i.latch:
+  %i.next = add nsw i64 %i, 1
+  %ec.i = icmp eq i64 %i.next, 9223372036854775807
+  br i1 %ec.i, label %exit, label %loop.i.header
+
+exit:
+  ret void
+}
+
+; for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
+;   if (i < m)
+;     for (j = 0; j < k; j++)
+;       a[i + j] = 0;
+;
+define void @nsw_under_loop_guard2(ptr %a, i64 %n, i64 %m, i64 %k) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: 'nsw_under_loop_guard2'
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Monotonicity check:
+; CHECK-NEXT:    Inst: store i8 0, ptr %idx, align 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:      Expr: {{\{\{}}0,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%loop.i.header>,+,1}<nuw><nsw><%loop.j>
+; CHECK-NEXT:      Monotonicity: MultivariateSignedMonotonic
+; CHECK-EMPTY:
+; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i8 0, ptr %idx, align 1 --> Dst: store i8 0, ptr %idx, align 1
+; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - output [* *]!
+;
+entry:
+  br label %loop.i.header
+
+loop.i.header:
+  %i = phi i64 [ 0 , %entry ], [ %i.next, %loop.i.latch ]
+  br label %loop.j.pr
+
+loop.j.pr:
+  %guard.j = icmp slt i64 %i, %m
+  br i1 %guard.j, label %loop.j, label %exit
+
+loop.j:
+  %j = phi i64 [ 0, %loop.j.pr ], [ %j.next, %loop.j ]
+  %val = phi i64 [ %i, %loop.j.pr ], [ %val.next, %loop.j ]
+  %j.next = add nsw i64 %j, 1
+  %idx = getelementptr inbounds i8, ptr %a, i64 %val
+  store i8 0, ptr %idx
+  %val.next = add nsw i64 %val, 1
+  %ec.j = icmp eq i64 %j.next, %k
+  br i1 %ec.j, label %loop.i.latch, label %loop.j
+
+loop.i.latch:
+  %i.next = add nsw i64 %i, 1
+  %ec.i = icmp eq i64 %i.next, %n
+  br i1 %ec.i, label %exit, label %loop.i.header
+
+exit:
+  ret void
+}