-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.2k
[AArch64] Support commuted operands in performFlagSettingCombine #162496
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Fixes llvm#122624. Assisted-by: gpt-5-codex
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-selectiondag @llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64 Author: Cullen Rhodes (c-rhodes) ChangesFixes #122624. Assisted-by: gpt-5-codex Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/162496.diff 3 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64ISelLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64ISelLowering.cpp
index dc8e7c84f5e2c..b8d81291a85d8 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64ISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64ISelLowering.cpp
@@ -26193,9 +26193,21 @@ static SDValue performFlagSettingCombine(SDNode *N,
}
// Combine identical generic nodes into this node, re-using the result.
- if (SDNode *Generic = DCI.DAG.getNodeIfExists(
- GenericOpcode, DCI.DAG.getVTList(VT), {LHS, RHS}))
- DCI.CombineTo(Generic, SDValue(N, 0));
+ auto CombineWithExistingGeneric = [&](SDValue Op0, SDValue Op1) {
+ if (SDNode *Generic = DCI.DAG.getNodeIfExists(
+ GenericOpcode, DCI.DAG.getVTList(VT), {Op0, Op1})) {
+ DCI.CombineTo(Generic, SDValue(N, 0));
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
+ };
+
+ if (CombineWithExistingGeneric(LHS, RHS))
+ return SDValue();
+
+ if (DCI.DAG.getTargetLoweringInfo().isCommutativeBinOp(GenericOpcode) &&
+ CombineWithExistingGeneric(RHS, LHS))
+ return SDValue();
return SDValue();
}
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/adds_cmn.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/adds_cmn.ll
index aa070b7886ba5..9b456a5419d61 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/adds_cmn.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/adds_cmn.ll
@@ -22,10 +22,8 @@ entry:
define { i32, i32 } @adds_cmn_c(i32 noundef %x, i32 noundef %y) {
; CHECK-LABEL: adds_cmn_c:
; CHECK: // %bb.0: // %entry
-; CHECK-NEXT: cmn w0, w1
-; CHECK-NEXT: add w1, w1, w0
-; CHECK-NEXT: cset w8, lo
-; CHECK-NEXT: mov w0, w8
+; CHECK-NEXT: adds w1, w0, w1
+; CHECK-NEXT: cset w0, lo
; CHECK-NEXT: ret
entry:
%0 = tail call { i32, i1 } @llvm.uadd.with.overflow.i32(i32 %x, i32 %y)
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/sat-add.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/sat-add.ll
index ecd48d6b7c65b..149b4c4fd26c9 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/sat-add.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/sat-add.ll
@@ -290,8 +290,7 @@ define i32 @unsigned_sat_variable_i32_using_cmp_sum(i32 %x, i32 %y) {
define i32 @unsigned_sat_variable_i32_using_cmp_notval(i32 %x, i32 %y) {
; CHECK-LABEL: unsigned_sat_variable_i32_using_cmp_notval:
; CHECK: // %bb.0:
-; CHECK-NEXT: add w8, w0, w1
-; CHECK-NEXT: cmn w1, w0
+; CHECK-NEXT: adds w8, w1, w0
; CHECK-NEXT: csinv w0, w8, wzr, lo
; CHECK-NEXT: ret
%noty = xor i32 %y, -1
@@ -331,8 +330,7 @@ define i64 @unsigned_sat_variable_i64_using_cmp_sum(i64 %x, i64 %y) {
define i64 @unsigned_sat_variable_i64_using_cmp_notval(i64 %x, i64 %y) {
; CHECK-LABEL: unsigned_sat_variable_i64_using_cmp_notval:
; CHECK: // %bb.0:
-; CHECK-NEXT: add x8, x0, x1
-; CHECK-NEXT: cmn x1, x0
+; CHECK-NEXT: adds x8, x1, x0
; CHECK-NEXT: csinv x0, x8, xzr, lo
; CHECK-NEXT: ret
%noty = xor i64 %y, -1
|
if (DCI.DAG.getTargetLoweringInfo().isCommutativeBinOp(GenericOpcode) && | ||
CombineWithExistingGeneric(RHS, LHS)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would it be better to extend getNodeIfExists
to support commuting its operands? If you're worried some uses may expect the exact operand order you could add an AllowCommute
or add a dedicated function with the ability. Doing this will make it trivial to migrate other call sites where commuting operands has value.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
that's a good idea, would it be ok if I look at that as a follow-up?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As discussion offline, it's not a strongly held view but it seems wrong to push this PR and then immediately revert it to implement my suggestion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
apologies, I missed your suggestion of only enabling AllowCommute
at this callsite to restrict to change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks 👍 I think Paul's suggestion is a good follow-up.
Fixes #122624.
Assisted-by: gpt-5-codex