-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.3k
[clangd] fix extract-to-function for overloaded operators #81640
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
HighCommander4
merged 6 commits into
llvm:main
from
5chmidti:clangd-extract-function-operators
Nov 15, 2024
+73
−8
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
04687eb
[clangd] fix extract-to-function for overloaded operators
5chmidti 0fda432
fix typo
5chmidti 6df0c2a
add test for single-expr-only
5chmidti 38003e3
add test for single expression extraction being not available
5chmidti b7dc747
fix typos
HighCommander4 84f6ec5
make fixme comment more precise
HighCommander4 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we need to make a corresponding change here? The comment suggests that it's special-casing
DeclStmtfor the same reason as this code.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think that would have any effect, because to hit this case, the common ancestor of our root statements needs to be completely selected, but the
CXXOperatorCallExprwill be unselected as shown in thisifhere.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess the difference is that a
DeclStmtcan have a singleVarDeclchild which could be completely selected, leaving theDeclStmtunselected. There is no analogous situation for aCXXOperatorCallExprwhich has multiple children.