Validate that raster layers do not specify both 'resampling' and 'raster-resampling'

[larsmaxfield]

Changes:

• If a raster layer specifies both 'resampling' and 'raster-resampling' paint properties, raise a ValidationError

In implementing 'resampling' in maplibre-gl-js, @HarelM and I concluded that the style spec should be responsible for catching when a raster layer specifies both 'resampling' and 'raster-resampling'.

Launch Checklist

• Briefly describe the changes in this PR.
• Write tests for all new functionality.
• Add an entry to CHANGELOG.md under the ## main section.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 93.79%. Comparing base (8d85feb) to head (ef2edbb).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1532   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.78%   93.79%           
=======================================
  Files         112      112           
  Lines        4668     4670    +2     
  Branches     1571     1572    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits         4378     4380    +2     
  Misses        290      290           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[larsmaxfield]

I did not update the resampling "sdk-support" because the implementation in GL JS has only been merged, not yet released. Does it make any sense to preemptively specify 5.20.0? Or instead wait until it's released and then merge this? (Or something else?)

[CommanderStorm]

we can do that now, this way it is out of the way

[larsmaxfield]

Done!

Are the .output-api-supported.json files updated in a special way? I only had layers.output.json change when I ran the layer test with the UPDATE=1 flag, and I don't know whether I should expect its output-api-supported counterpart to change as well.

[HarelM]

Looking at the code you added, this looks as expected. When you update the layers.input.json and run update=1 the output should change according to the changes you created in the input.
Was the process not working as expected?

[larsmaxfield]

Ok that's good to hear. And it's my lack of familiarity with the codebase that's the issue 😄 I couldn't find what distinguishes output-api-supported from simply output so I was unsure if I missed something.

[HarelM]

Oh, I understand the question now. I'm not sure they are in use anymore.
I wonder when we stopped using them though...

[larsmaxfield]

Ah ok 👍

[HarelM]

Created a PR to remove them:

• Remove unneeded files, improve typings. #1533

To avoid future confusion.
I think they were used with mapbox related stuff (mapbox://), but they never got to be used in this repo when we took this part out of maplibre-gl-js.