Skip to content

Conversation

@Rup-Narayan-Rajbanshi
Copy link
Contributor

@Rup-Narayan-Rajbanshi Rup-Narayan-Rajbanshi commented Jul 18, 2025

Changes

  • add archivable fields for organization.

# NOTE: We can remove this
nameKey:
type: string
isArchived:
Copy link
Contributor

@tnagorra tnagorra Jul 20, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's add a NOTE that these were added on revamp.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@thenav56 Should we add all of these fields?

Copy link
Contributor

@tnagorra tnagorra Jul 21, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From the conversation with @thenav56, let's only add isArchived.
It can be an optional field.

@tnagorra tnagorra requested a review from susilnem July 21, 2025 06:16
@tnagorra tnagorra self-assigned this Jul 21, 2025
@Rup-Narayan-Rajbanshi Rup-Narayan-Rajbanshi marked this pull request as draft July 21, 2025 09:50
@tnagorra tnagorra changed the title chore(organization): add archivable fields for organization. feat: add archivable fields for organization. Jul 21, 2025
@tnagorra tnagorra marked this pull request as ready for review July 21, 2025 13:26
@Rup-Narayan-Rajbanshi Rup-Narayan-Rajbanshi force-pushed the feature/organization branch 2 times, most recently from 538a2b0 to 7d1cc7a Compare July 24, 2025 04:33
@susilnem susilnem force-pushed the feature/organization branch from cbb6866 to 2e43a4c Compare July 25, 2025 05:13
@susilnem susilnem merged commit f83846f into develop Jul 25, 2025
2 checks passed
@susilnem susilnem deleted the feature/organization branch July 25, 2025 05:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants