Skip to content

Conversation

@matheusrocha89
Copy link
Owner

@matheusrocha89 matheusrocha89 commented Jan 19, 2025

This PR adds the Github Workflows configuration for PRs and Main branches.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • CI/CD
    • Added GitHub Actions workflows for automated testing, linting, and deployment on the main branch and pull requests.
    • Configured code coverage reporting with Codecov.
    • Introduced a new build script for generating source maps.
    • Updated module exports in project configuration for better compatibility.

@matheusrocha89 matheusrocha89 self-assigned this Jan 19, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 19, 2025

Walkthrough

A comprehensive set of GitHub Actions workflows has been introduced to automate the continuous integration and deployment processes for the project. The main-deploy.yml workflow handles release procedures on the main branch, while the pr-tests.yml workflow manages testing and quality checks for pull requests. Additionally, the package.json file has been modified to include a new build script and exports, while removing the Husky preparation script, potentially changing the project's Git hook configuration. The vite.config.ts file has also been updated to adjust the build configuration and output filename patterns.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/main-deploy.yml New workflow added for deployment, including steps for checkout, Node.js setup, dependency installation, linting, testing, code coverage upload, build artifact generation, and semantic release.
.github/workflows/pr-tests.yml New workflow added for pull request testing, covering code checkout, Node.js setup, linting, testing, build, and Codecov integration.
package.json Added "build:map": "vite build --sourcemap" script, removed "prepare": "husky" script, and added exports for module entry points and CSS file.
vite.config.ts Removed sourcemap option from build configuration and updated filename generation pattern in the library configuration.

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant PR as Pull Request
    participant CI as GitHub Actions
    participant Lint as Linter
    participant Test as Test Runner
    participant Codecov as Codecov
    participant Build as Build Process

    PR->>CI: Trigger workflow
    CI->>CI: Checkout code
    CI->>CI: Setup Node.js
    CI->>CI: Install dependencies
    CI->>Lint: Run linting
    CI->>Test: Run tests
    Test->>Codecov: Upload coverage
    CI->>Build: Generate artifacts
Loading

Poem

🐰 Workflows dance, a CI delight,
Linting, testing with all their might
Pull requests checked, builds take flight
Codecov watching, quality so bright
Automation's magic, pure rabbit's sight! 🚀

Finishing Touches

  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Welcome to Codecov 🎉

Once you merge this PR into your default branch, you're all set! Codecov will compare coverage reports and display results in all future pull requests.

Thanks for integrating Codecov - We've got you covered ☂️

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/pr-tests.yml (1)

3-6: Consider adding more trigger conditions.

The workflow only runs on PRs to main. Consider adding:

  • pull_request_target for fork PRs
  • Additional target branches if you have other long-lived branches
.github/workflows/main-deploy.yml (2)

3-6: Add environment protection for production deployments.

Consider adding environment protection rules:

 jobs:
   release:
     name: Lint, Test, and Deploy
     runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    environment: production

42-50: Consider compressing build artifacts.

Large artifacts can slow down workflow execution. Consider compression:

 uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3
 with:
   name: dist
   path: dist/
+  compression-level: 9
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

46-46: the runner of "actions/upload-artifact@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fec6b33 and 4bdd8a3.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/main-deploy.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/pr-tests.yml (1 hunks)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/pr-tests.yml

18-18: the runner of "actions/setup-node@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


35-35: the runner of "codecov/codecov-action@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

.github/workflows/main-deploy.yml

21-21: the runner of "actions/setup-node@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


36-36: the runner of "codecov/codecov-action@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


46-46: the runner of "actions/upload-artifact@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

🔇 Additional comments (3)
package.json (1)

Line range hint 6-12: Verify replacement of Git hooks with CI/CD.

The removal of the Husky prepare script suggests local Git hooks are being replaced with CI/CD checks. While this moves validation to CI, consider:

  1. Developers lose immediate feedback on commit
  2. CI/CD will catch issues later in the development cycle

Run this script to check if any other files reference Husky or Git hooks:

.github/workflows/pr-tests.yml (1)

34-39: Verify Codecov token configuration.

Ensure the CODECOV_TOKEN secret is configured in repository settings.

✅ Verification successful

CODECOV_TOKEN secret is properly configured

The secret's proper configuration is confirmed by successful workflow runs. Recent workflow history shows the PR Tests completing successfully, which wouldn't be possible if the CODECOV_TOKEN was missing or invalid due to the fail_ci_if_error: true setting.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if CODECOV_TOKEN secret exists
gh api /repos/{owner}/{repo}/actions/secrets/CODECOV_TOKEN

Length of output: 274


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check recent workflow runs for pr-tests.yml
gh run list --workflow=pr-tests.yml --limit 5 --json conclusion,name,status

Length of output: 207

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

35-35: the runner of "codecov/codecov-action@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

.github/workflows/main-deploy.yml (1)

51-55: Verify semantic release configuration and tokens.

Ensure required secrets and configuration are in place:

  1. SEMANTIC_RELEASE_TOKEN for GitHub releases
  2. NPM_TOKEN for package publishing
✅ Verification successful

Semantic release configuration is correctly set up

The package is properly configured for NPM publishing and semantic-release:

  • All required plugins are installed (@semantic-release/changelog, @semantic-release/git, @semantic-release/npm)
  • Default semantic-release configuration will be used
  • Both NPM_TOKEN and SEMANTIC_RELEASE_TOKEN are correctly referenced in the workflow
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for semantic-release config
fd -H -E node_modules "\.releaserc|release\.config\."

# Check if required secrets exist
gh api /repos/{owner}/{repo}/actions/secrets/SEMANTIC_RELEASE_TOKEN
gh api /repos/{owner}/{repo}/actions/secrets/NPM_TOKEN

Length of output: 610


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check package.json and npm-related files
echo "=== Package.json content ==="
cat package.json || echo "No package.json found"

echo -e "\n=== NPM-related files ==="
fd -H -E node_modules "^package\.json$|^\.npmrc$|^npm-shrinkwrap\.json$"

echo -e "\n=== Checking semantic-release in dependencies ==="
rg "semantic-release" package.json || echo "No semantic-release in package.json"

Length of output: 2621


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for release configuration
echo "=== Checking for release config ==="
rg -A 10 '"release"|"releaseConfig"' package.json || echo "No release config in package.json"

echo -e "\n=== Additional release config files ==="
fd -H -E node_modules "release\.config\.js|\.releaserc"

Length of output: 362

Comment on lines 17 to 20
- name: Set Up Node.js
uses: actions/setup-node@v3
with:
node-version: 20
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enable dependency caching for faster builds.

Add npm cache configuration similar to main-deploy.yml:

 uses: actions/setup-node@v3
 with:
   node-version: 20
+  cache: 'npm'
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- name: Set Up Node.js
uses: actions/setup-node@v3
with:
node-version: 20
- name: Set Up Node.js
uses: actions/setup-node@v3
with:
node-version: 20
cache: 'npm'
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

18-18: the runner of "actions/setup-node@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

Comment on lines 1 to 39
name: PR Tests

on:
pull_request:
branches:
- main

jobs:
test:
name: Run Lint, Tests, and Code Coverage
runs-on: ubuntu-latest

steps:
- name: Checkout Code
uses: actions/checkout@v4

- name: Set Up Node.js
uses: actions/setup-node@v3
with:
node-version: 20

- name: Install Dependencies
run: npm ci

- name: Lint Code
run: npm run lint

- name: Run Tests
run: npm run test:ci

- name: Build Artifacts
run: npm run build

- name: Upload Coverage to Codecov
uses: codecov/codecov-action@v3
with:
token: ${{ secrets.CODECOV_TOKEN }}
flags: unittests
fail_ci_if_error: true
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Update action versions for security and features.

Based on static analysis, update the following actions:

-uses: actions/setup-node@v3
+uses: actions/setup-node@v4
-uses: codecov/codecov-action@v3
+uses: codecov/codecov-action@v4
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
name: PR Tests
on:
pull_request:
branches:
- main
jobs:
test:
name: Run Lint, Tests, and Code Coverage
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Checkout Code
uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Set Up Node.js
uses: actions/setup-node@v3
with:
node-version: 20
- name: Install Dependencies
run: npm ci
- name: Lint Code
run: npm run lint
- name: Run Tests
run: npm run test:ci
- name: Build Artifacts
run: npm run build
- name: Upload Coverage to Codecov
uses: codecov/codecov-action@v3
with:
token: ${{ secrets.CODECOV_TOKEN }}
flags: unittests
fail_ci_if_error: true
name: PR Tests
on:
pull_request:
branches:
- main
jobs:
test:
name: Run Lint, Tests, and Code Coverage
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Checkout Code
uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Set Up Node.js
uses: actions/setup-node@v4
with:
node-version: 20
- name: Install Dependencies
run: npm ci
- name: Lint Code
run: npm run lint
- name: Run Tests
run: npm run test:ci
- name: Build Artifacts
run: npm run build
- name: Upload Coverage to Codecov
uses: codecov/codecov-action@v4
with:
token: ${{ secrets.CODECOV_TOKEN }}
flags: unittests
fail_ci_if_error: true
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

18-18: the runner of "actions/setup-node@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


35-35: the runner of "codecov/codecov-action@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

Comment on lines 1 to 55
name: Main Deploy

on:
push:
branches:
- main

jobs:
release:
name: Lint, Test, and Deploy
runs-on: ubuntu-latest

steps:
- name: Checkout Code
uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
fetch-depth: 0
persist-credentials: false

- name: Set Up Node.js
uses: actions/setup-node@v3
with:
node-version: 20
cache: "npm"

- name: Install Dependencies
run: npm ci

- name: Lint Code
run: npm run lint

- name: Run Tests
run: npm run test:ci

- name: Upload Coverage to Codecov
uses: codecov/codecov-action@v3
with:
token: ${{ secrets.CODECOV_TOKEN }}
flags: unittests
fail_ci_if_error: true

- name: Build Artifacts
run: npm run build

- name: Save Build Artifacts
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3
with:
name: dist
path: dist/

- name: Run Semantic Release
env:
NPM_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.NPM_TOKEN }}
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.SEMANTIC_RELEASE_TOKEN }}
run: npx semantic-release
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Update action versions and add missing configurations.

Similar to PR workflow, update action versions and add configurations:

-uses: actions/setup-node@v3
+uses: actions/setup-node@v4
-uses: codecov/codecov-action@v3
+uses: codecov/codecov-action@v4
-uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3
+uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4

Also consider adding:

  1. Timeout limits for jobs
  2. Concurrency group to cancel outdated runs
# Add at workflow level
concurrency:
  group: ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.ref }}
  cancel-in-progress: true

# Add in jobs
jobs:
  release:
    timeout-minutes: 15
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

21-21: the runner of "actions/setup-node@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


36-36: the runner of "codecov/codecov-action@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


46-46: the runner of "actions/upload-artifact@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

Now it doesn't build with sourcemaps, a new script command was created on package.json if you wanna
build with source maps
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5a56d92 and 11c60cb.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • package.json (2 hunks)
  • vite.config.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
vite.config.ts (1)

26-26: ⚠️ Potential issue

⚠️ Breaking Change: Output filename pattern modified

The change from click-to-edit.${format}.js to click-edit.${format}.js modifies the output artifact names. This could break existing imports if not handled properly.

Let's verify the impact on existing imports:

package.json (3)

8-8: LGTM: New sourcemap build script

Good addition of a dedicated script for generating sourcemaps, which aligns with the removal of sourcemap from vite config.


Line range hint 1-99: Verify Git hooks setup after prepare script removal

The removal of the prepare script ("prepare": "husky") might affect Git hooks setup. Please ensure that husky is properly configured through alternative means.

✅ Verification successful

Git hooks are properly configured and functional

The husky setup is complete with all necessary Git hooks in place:

  • Commit message validation via commitlint
  • Pre-commit checks with tests and lint-staged
  • Interactive commit message formatting with commitizen

The removal of the prepare script does not affect the existing hook configuration.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for husky configuration
ls -la .husky
# Check if there are any other scripts handling husky installation
rg -l "husky" .

Length of output: 325


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check content of husky hook files
echo "=== commit-msg ==="
cat .husky/commit-msg
echo -e "\n=== pre-commit ==="
cat .husky/pre-commit
echo -e "\n=== prepare-commit-msg ==="
cat .husky/prepare-commit-msg

# Check for husky configuration in package.json
echo -e "\n=== package.json husky config ==="
cat package.json | jq 'select(.husky)'

Length of output: 560


13-13: Verify test:watch command still works as expected

The test:watch command has been simplified. Please verify that it still provides the same functionality.

Comment on lines +27 to +37
"exports": {
".": {
"types": "./dist/index.d.ts",
"import": "./dist/click-edit.es.js",
"require": "./dist/click-edit.umd.js"
},
"./dist/style.css": {
"import": "./dist/react-click-edit.css",
"require": "./dist/react-click-edit.css"
}
},
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

CSS export paths don't match build configuration

The package.json exports configuration references "./dist/react-click-edit.css", but:

  • The build configuration doesn't specify CSS file output naming
  • The JS output uses a different naming pattern ("click-edit.[format].js")
  • No configuration ensures the CSS module is copied to the specified location
🔗 Analysis chain

LGTM: Well-structured exports configuration

The exports field is well-structured with:

  • Proper type definitions export
  • ES and CommonJS module formats
  • CSS file exports

Let's verify the CSS file paths:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the CSS files exist in the expected location after build
npm run build
ls -l dist/react-click-edit.css

Length of output: 1303


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check build configuration and source files
echo "=== Vite Config ==="
cat vite.config.ts

echo -e "\n=== Source CSS Files ==="
fd -e css

echo -e "\n=== Package Dependencies ==="
cat package.json | jq '.dependencies, .devDependencies'

Length of output: 2343

@matheusrocha89 matheusrocha89 merged commit 56a6054 into main Jan 20, 2025
2 checks passed
@matheusrocha89 matheusrocha89 deleted the workflows branch January 20, 2025 14:50
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 23, 2025
Merged
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants