Skip to content

Conversation

@JojoS62
Copy link

@JojoS62 JojoS62 commented Feb 1, 2025

Summary of changes

This PR adds an older LPCXpresso LPC1769 target. Oldie but Goldie.
It adds also the MCU_LPC176X for modified MCU files, the existing MCU_LPC1768 is not changed.

Impact of changes

Migration actions required

Documentation

Needs updated documentation in Mbed-CE Wiki pages for this target.


Pull request type

[] Patch update (Bug fix / Target update / Docs update / Test update / Refactor)
[x] Feature update (New feature / Functionality change / New API)
[] Major update (Breaking change E.g. Return code change / API behaviour change)

Test results

[] No Tests required for this change (E.g docs only update)
[] Covered by existing mbed-os tests (Greentea or Unittest)
[] Tests / results supplied as part of this PR

Some tests are necessary.

Todo:

  • add clock options for 96 / 100 / 120 MHz
  • test localfilesystem
  • update Wiki pages

@JojoS62 JojoS62 marked this pull request as draft February 1, 2025 18:13
@multiplemonomials
Copy link
Collaborator

Since LPC1769 (unlike LPC1768) can go up to 120MHz, let's increase the clock frequency if possible!

@JojoS62
Copy link
Author

JojoS62 commented Feb 2, 2025

Yes, clock option is already on the todo list.

@JojoS62 JojoS62 force-pushed the add-target-lpcxpresso1769 branch from c064da8 to eba6559 Compare March 7, 2025 20:38
@multiplemonomials multiplemonomials force-pushed the add-target-lpcxpresso1769 branch from eba6559 to 1c0a34a Compare August 5, 2025 16:23
@multiplemonomials multiplemonomials marked this pull request as ready for review August 6, 2025 16:16
@multiplemonomials
Copy link
Collaborator

TODO need to update doc website

@multiplemonomials multiplemonomials merged commit 4ba0016 into master Aug 7, 2025
52 checks passed
@multiplemonomials multiplemonomials deleted the add-target-lpcxpresso1769 branch August 7, 2025 15:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants