Skip to content

Conversation

zwang123
Copy link
Contributor

@zwang123 zwang123 commented Sep 20, 2025

Will mark this ready once #5015 is merged and merge conflict is resolved.

Copy link
Contributor

@tirix tirix left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's really interesting to see a formalization of universal properties!
There are several objects which could (also) be defined in terms of universal properties, it would really be interesting to see universal properties in action.

@zwang123
Copy link
Contributor Author

It's really interesting to see a formalization of universal properties! There are several objects which could (also) be defined in terms of universal properties, it would really be interesting to see universal properties in action.

I observe tensor product being defined with a universal property in a textbook but I guess it would only generate an equivalence class if it were used as the definition in metabox. Still a good property to prove that some objects have! Also sometimes I think we want the equivalence class to be defined, in which case it could work in definition.

@zwang123 zwang123 marked this pull request as ready for review September 22, 2025 13:09
@wlammen wlammen merged commit fb3bb1b into metamath:develop Sep 28, 2025
10 checks passed
@zwang123 zwang123 deleted the upcic branch September 28, 2025 15:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants