Reduce log level for per file level logs in RustSbomDetector

[AMaini503]

Reduce log level for per file level logs in RustSbomDetector

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.0%. Comparing base (f254244) to head (02cdee5).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main   #1603   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   90.0%   90.0%           
=====================================
  Files        435     437    +2     
  Lines      37107   37195   +88     
  Branches    2299    2308    +9     
=====================================
+ Hits       33426   33506   +80     
- Misses      3209    3217    +8     
  Partials     472     472           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR reduces the verbosity of per-file logging in the RustSbomDetector by changing two log statements from Information level to Debug level. This prevents excessive log output during component detection in repositories with many Rust manifest files.

• Changes log level for "Processing file" message from LogInformation to LogDebug
• Changes log level for "Skipping file due to skip rules" message from LogInformation to LogDebug

[github-actions]

👋 Hi! It looks like you modified some files in the Detectors folder.
You may need to bump the detector versions if any of the following scenarios apply:

• The detector detects more or fewer components than before
• The detector generates different parent/child graph relationships than before
• The detector generates different devDependencies values than before

If none of the above scenarios apply, feel free to ignore this comment 🙂

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.