Skip to content

debug: http api error#498

Merged
shanghaikid merged 2 commits intomainfrom
fix/httpapi
Jan 19, 2026
Merged

debug: http api error#498
shanghaikid merged 2 commits intomainfrom
fix/httpapi

Conversation

@shanghaikid
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: ryjiang <jiangruiyi@gmail.com>
@sre-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: shanghaikid

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @shanghaikid, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on enhancing the robustness of the HTTP API client by addressing a potential TypeError that could occur if the topks property in an API response was null or undefined. A defensive check has been implemented to ensure safe access to this property. Additionally, a temporary debugging statement was added to a test file to assist in diagnosing related issues, aligning with the PR's title indicating a debugging effort for an HTTP API error.

Highlights

  • API Robustness: Added a null/undefined check for the res.topks property in milvus/http/Vector.ts to prevent potential runtime errors when processing HTTP API responses where topks might be missing or null.
  • Debugging Aid: Introduced a console.log statement in test/http/test.ts to output the refresh variable, likely for debugging purposes related to the HTTP API.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a bug fix in milvus/http/Vector.ts to handle cases where res.topks might be undefined in the API response, preventing a potential runtime error. This is a good defensive measure. However, a console.log statement and an extra blank line, likely used for debugging, have been left in test/http/test.ts. These should be removed before merging.

Comment on lines 354 to 355
console.log(refresh);

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

This console.log statement and the following blank line appear to be for debugging purposes. They should be removed before merging to keep the codebase clean and avoid polluting test output.

Signed-off-by: ryjiang <jiangruiyi@gmail.com>
@shanghaikid shanghaikid merged commit 07cb4f0 into main Jan 19, 2026
2 of 3 checks passed
@shanghaikid shanghaikid deleted the fix/httpapi branch January 19, 2026 02:12
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 19, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 97.19%. Comparing base (aa24044) to head (6e6153b).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #498      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   97.16%   97.19%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          52       52              
  Lines        3628     3674      +46     
  Branches      978      978              
==========================================
+ Hits         3525     3571      +46     
  Misses         98       98              
  Partials        5        5              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants