-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
feat(ci): update workflow to build and publish Docker image to GHCR #231
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughA new Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant GitHub Actions
participant GitHub Container Registry
participant Docker Buildx
GitHub Actions->>GitHub Actions: Run coverage job
GitHub Actions->>GitHub Actions: Start container job (after coverage)
GitHub Actions->>GitHub Container Registry: Login using GitHub actor and token
GitHub Actions->>Docker Buildx: Set up Docker Buildx
GitHub Actions->>Docker Buildx: Build Docker image
Docker Buildx->>GitHub Container Registry: Push image with tags (latest, main, SHA)
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Coverage summary from CodacySee diff coverage on Codacy
Coverage variation details
Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: Diff coverage details
Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: See your quality gate settings Change summary preferences |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
.github/workflows/dotnet.yml (4)
108-111: Container job declaration: The newcontainerjob correctly depends oncoverageand runs onubuntu-latest. To avoid unintentionally pushing images from pull requests, consider adding a condition such as:if: ${{ github.event_name == 'push' }}at the job level.
116-119: Checkout step security: Theactions/checkout@v4step by default persists theGITHUB_TOKEN, which could grant broader access than needed. It’s recommended to add:- uses: actions/checkout@v4 with: persist-credentials: falseand rely on your explicit Docker login step for authentication.
127-129: Docker Buildx setup:docker/setup-buildx-action@v3prepares Buildx for advanced builds. If you plan to publish multi-architecture images, consider specifyingplatforms:in the subsequent build step (e.g.,linux/amd64,linux/arm64).
131-139: Build and push Docker image: Thedocker/build-push-action@v5configuration correctly pushes the image withlatest,main, andsha-${{ github.sha }}tags. For improved performance, you may enable build caching (cache-from/cache-to) and explicitly defineplatforms.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/workflows/dotnet.yml(1 hunks)README.md(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (3)
README.md (1)
49-51: Close the Markdown code block: Added the missing closing triple backticks to properly terminate the code block after thedocker runcommand. This ensures the README renders correctly..github/workflows/dotnet.yml (2)
112-115: Job-level permissions: Grantingcontents: readandpackages: writeis appropriate for checking out code and pushing images to GHCR. Necessary permissions are in place.
120-126: GHCR login step: Usingdocker/login-action@v3withregistry: ghcr.ioand theGITHUB_TOKENfor authentication is correct and secure.
|



Summary by CodeRabbit