-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 171
feat: Binary dtype support
#2243
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
FBruzzesi
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @marvinl803 π
I added a couple of commits to support spark-like as well and fix a typo in the docstrings.
I will wait for someone else to review this as I am a bit biased π
In the meanwhile, I opened a PR in py-shiny to add binary support there as well
MarcoGorelli
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
|
@FBruzzesi feel free to ship! |
Thank you as well, @FBruzzesi I really appreciate it π! |
| def test_cast_binary(request: pytest.FixtureRequest, constructor: Constructor) -> None: | ||
| if "pandas" in str(constructor) and PANDAS_VERSION < (2, 2): | ||
| request.applymarker(pytest.mark.xfail) | ||
|
|
||
| if any(backend in str(constructor) for backend in ("dask", "modin")): | ||
| request.applymarker(pytest.mark.xfail) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@marvinl803 could we also skip this test for cudf please?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nevermind, just did it - thanks again for your pr!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My bad, I just saw this. Absolutely no problem at all!

What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)
Related issues
Binary&TimedatatypeΒ #1989Binary&TimedatatypeΒ #1989Checklist
If you have comments or can explain your changes, please do so below
This is a follow up to issue #1989 where it adds support to the Binary datatype. If there is any further changes needed, please let me know.