Skip to content

Conversation

@phil198
Copy link
Contributor

@phil198 phil198 commented Jul 24, 2024

This PR is for the examples and general description of the User Auth Providers feature. Its currently applicable to native auth, LDAP and OIDC.

@phil198 phil198 marked this pull request as draft July 24, 2024 15:47
@renetapopova renetapopova self-requested a review July 29, 2024 14:08
@renetapopova renetapopova self-assigned this Jul 31, 2024
@renetapopova renetapopova removed the 5.23 label Aug 1, 2024
@phil198 phil198 force-pushed the linked-users branch 2 times, most recently from 0eb2389 to 63f5c35 Compare August 19, 2024 16:01
@phil198 phil198 marked this pull request as ready for review August 19, 2024 16:03
@phil198 phil198 changed the title linked users User Auth Objects Aug 20, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@Hunterness Hunterness left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Have only really looked at the generic and native auth parts so far, but I'll pause here for now as I've collected several comments already XD

Copy link
Contributor

@Hunterness Hunterness left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewing the review fixes

Copy link
Contributor

@Hunterness Hunterness left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Comments from the ldap page

@phil198 phil198 added 5.24 and removed 5.25 labels Aug 27, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@Hunterness Hunterness left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some comments around the version label, most of which are reminders to make sure it is the correct version before merging

Copy link
Contributor

@Hunterness Hunterness left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Comments on sso-integration

@phil198 phil198 changed the title User Auth Objects User Auth Providers Aug 27, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@Hunterness Hunterness left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Found I forgot to post the comments on my review of the updates yesterday, did look over all the files I had previously looked at and added one more comment this morning but it might be a duplicate from yesterday (I didn't see it in the all commit view but I remember adding a comment like it at least so it might have either been on another row or the bit of code has moved or something between looking on yesterdays commits only and all commits 🤷)

Copy link
Contributor

@Hunterness Hunterness left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Comments from the last file, now all files have been looked at at least once

@renetapopova
Copy link
Collaborator

Hey @phil198, please let me know when this is ready for a review from my side.

@phil198
Copy link
Contributor Author

phil198 commented Sep 3, 2024

Hey @phil198, please let me know when this is ready for a review from my side.
Hi @renetapopova. Please go ahead when convenient. Or if you prefer, can wait till we've resolved the cypher-operations comments to make things simpler?

Copy link
Contributor

@Hunterness Hunterness left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

And then we still need to update the SHOW CURRENT USER column table to also include that the password change required field is null if there is no native auth like we did for the SHOW USERS column table.

@neo-technology-commit-status-publisher
Copy link
Collaborator

neo-technology-commit-status-publisher commented Sep 25, 2024

Thanks for the documentation updates.

The preview documentation has now been torn down - reopening this PR will republish it.

@renetapopova renetapopova merged commit fc7da99 into neo4j:dev Sep 25, 2024
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment