Skip to content

Conversation

@aduh95
Copy link
Contributor

@aduh95 aduh95 commented Nov 24, 2025

It's deceivingly easy to end up with a clear-text value when trying to modify an existing encrypted config entry. I think throwing in this case is a safer behavior.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 24, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 8 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 80.58%. Comparing base (7342aff) to head (42dc752).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
lib/config.js 50.00% 8 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1006      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   80.65%   80.58%   -0.08%     
==========================================
  Files          39       39              
  Lines        4746     4754       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits         3828     3831       +3     
- Misses        918      923       +5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@aduh95 aduh95 force-pushed the partially-encrypted-config-files- branch from d1241ba to 42dc752 Compare November 24, 2025 20:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant