-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 1.4k
Manifest update: configurable Encryption permission for the SMP service #17436
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
216c58f
ffb0816
af3b1a8
e5ca83d
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ Building and running | |||||
| .. include:: /includes/build_and_run.txt | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| .. note:: | ||||||
| To prevent an unauthenticated access to the device over SMP, it is strongly recommended to enable the :kconfig:option:`CONFIG_MCUMGR_TRANSPORT_BT_AUTHEN` option. | ||||||
| To prevent an unauthenticated access to the device over SMP, it is strongly recommended to enable the :kconfig:option:`CONFIG_MCUMGR_TRANSPORT_BT_PERM_RW_AUTHEN` option. | ||||||
| This will enforce a remote device to initiate a pairing request before accessing SMP characteristics. | ||||||
| See `SMP over Bluetooth authentication`_ for more information. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
@@ -221,12 +221,12 @@ SMP over Bluetooth authentication | |||||
| ================================= | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| By default, the SMP characteristics don't require authentication when using SMP over Bluetooth to access the :ref:`management subsystem <zephyr:mcu_mgr>`. | ||||||
|
||||||
| By default, the SMP characteristics don't require authentication when using SMP over Bluetooth to access the :ref:`management subsystem <zephyr:mcu_mgr>`. | |
| By default, the SMP characteristics do not require authentication when using SMP over Bluetooth to access the :ref:`management subsystem <zephyr:mcu_mgr>`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is unrelated to my change. @peknis, could you raise a PR aligning this part?
It takes a lot of effort to make CI green for such complex upgrades and there is a lot of stuff in the pipeline for the next release. I would like to avoid unnecessary CI runs as part of this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can take this later as this is not a crucial thing.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.