Conversation
|
The following seem to be a new failures in the revdeps. Can you please have a look? |
|
Thanks for pointing those out. We have added new checks for encodings in pattern matching and it looks like those two errors are legit. I'm gonna put a version upper-bound for those dependencies. cc/ @hhugo |
|
Actually let me see if we should change some of this: https://github.com/ocaml-community/sedlex/pull/127/files#r2115965034 |
|
I think we should add constraint for ppx_css 0.15,0.16 and 0.17 because their use of sedlex is suspicious. It was fixed on master. I suspect the fstar failure is just exposing a bug but I need to confirm this. I need to check the owi failure Styled-ppx is similar to ppx_css but is not fixed upstream. |
I started doing the version limitation but realized that, if the behavior we're flagging as erroneous now used to work we should instead update our changes to be backward-compatible. |
|
For ppx_css styled_css and fstar, it used to compile but was not doing the right thing I claim. |
|
Ok I can confirm that |
|
FStarLang/FStar#3860 fixes Fstar |
|
styled-ppx fix in davesnx/styled-ppx#555 |
|
Thanks a lot. One last thing and we can merge. |
|
@toots, the owi error is caused by ocaml-community/sedlex#168. |
|
The owi runtest error is also present on the main branch |
|
https://github.com/WebAssembly/testsuite/blob/main/names.wast is the file responsible for the failure. |
|
There my be a bug in ocaml-community/sedlex#168 |
|
sedlex fix in ocaml-community/sedlex#171 |
|
I think that we should do another release with the new fix. @hhugo do you have another concern w.r.t. to the current code base? |
sounds good. |
sedlex.3.5An OCaml lexer generator for Unicode
sedlex is a lexer generator for OCaml. It is similar to ocamllex, but supports
Unicode. Unlike ocamllex, sedlex allows lexer specifications within regular
OCaml source files. Lexing specific constructs are provided via a ppx syntax
extension.
🐫 Pull-request generated by opam-publish v2.5.0