Skip to content

Conversation

vrutkovs
Copy link
Member

@vrutkovs vrutkovs commented Aug 4, 2025

No description provided.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Aug 4, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 4, 2025

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 4, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vrutkovs

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 4, 2025
@vrutkovs
Copy link
Member Author

vrutkovs commented Aug 4, 2025

/test e2e-aws-ovn

1 similar comment
@vrutkovs
Copy link
Member Author

vrutkovs commented Aug 4, 2025

/test e2e-aws-ovn

@vrutkovs
Copy link
Member Author

vrutkovs commented Aug 4, 2025

/test e2e-aws-ovn

@vrutkovs vrutkovs force-pushed the auditpolicycontroller-lister branch from a36256c to 0070507 Compare August 5, 2025 07:42
@vrutkovs
Copy link
Member Author

vrutkovs commented Aug 5, 2025

/test e2e-aws-ovn

1 similar comment
@vrutkovs
Copy link
Member Author

vrutkovs commented Aug 5, 2025

/test e2e-aws-ovn

@vrutkovs vrutkovs force-pushed the auditpolicycontroller-lister branch from cf81f61 to 0df0169 Compare August 5, 2025 08:05
@vrutkovs
Copy link
Member Author

vrutkovs commented Aug 5, 2025

/test e2e-aws-ovn

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 5, 2025
@vrutkovs vrutkovs force-pushed the auditpolicycontroller-lister branch from 0df0169 to 49e557e Compare August 5, 2025 09:57
@vrutkovs vrutkovs force-pushed the auditpolicycontroller-lister branch from 49e557e to a1d84d0 Compare August 5, 2025 10:01
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 5, 2025
@vrutkovs
Copy link
Member Author

vrutkovs commented Aug 5, 2025

/test e2e-aws-ovn

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 11, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 11, 2025

@vrutkovs: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-tests-extension a1d84d0 link true /test e2e-tests-extension

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants