Skip to content

OCPBUGS#60416 [enterprise-4.12] There is one more wrong example in FROM clause of image layering docs #97568

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

palonsoro
Copy link
Contributor

@palonsoro palonsoro commented Aug 14, 2025

Fixed one more mistaken example of how the base image for RHCOS layering is expected to look like.

Manual enterprise-4.12 backport.

Version(s):

4.12 and higher up to latest (this concrete PR is for 4.12).

Issue:

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-60416

Original PR:

#97433

Link to docs preview:

https://97568--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/post_installation_configuration/coreos-layering.html

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

This is a manual backport of PR#97433, because the commit could not be automatically cherry-picked by the bot.

…OM clause of image layering docs

Fixed one more mistaken example of how the base image for RHCOS layering
is expected to look like.

Manual enterprise-4.12 backport.
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 14, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

🤖 Thu Aug 14 08:40:13 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://97568--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/post_installation_configuration/coreos-layering.html

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 14, 2025

@palonsoro: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@palonsoro
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 14, 2025
@palonsoro
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 14, 2025
@palonsoro
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Aug 14, 2025
@jeana-redhat
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks, @palonsoro!

@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat added the merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR label Aug 14, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

/remove-label merge-review-in-progress
/remove-label merge-review-needed

@jeana-redhat jeana-redhat merged commit 66fb4a1 into openshift:enterprise-4.12 Aug 14, 2025
2 checks passed
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Aug 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants