-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 74
[release-4.18] OCPBUGS-62480: Fix job success logic #3377
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release-4.18] OCPBUGS-62480: Fix job success logic #3377
Conversation
We are reporting jobs as failed if a pod within the job failed. This is incorrect logic, as a single pod failing is not a failure state for the entire job. The job will keep creating pods until a success is seen.
|
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-60967 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62480. Will retitle bug to link to clone. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62480, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/approve |
|
/lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-cherrypick-robot, sebsoto The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/lgtm |
|
/hold Revision daf778c was retested 3 times: holding |
|
/hold cancel |
|
/override ci/prow/vsphere-disconnected-e2e-operator ci/prow/aws-e2e-operator |
|
/cherry-pick release-4.17 release-4.16 |
|
@sebsoto: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@sebsoto: Overrode contexts on behalf of sebsoto: ci/prow/aws-e2e-operator, ci/prow/vsphere-disconnected-e2e-operator In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/override ci/prow/vsphere-proxy-e2e-operator |
|
@sebsoto: Overrode contexts on behalf of sebsoto: ci/prow/vsphere-proxy-e2e-operator In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/hold Revision daf778c was retested 3 times: holding |
|
/hold cancel |
|
/override ci/prow/platform-none-vsphere-e2e-operator |
|
@sebsoto: Overrode contexts on behalf of sebsoto: ci/prow/platform-none-vsphere-e2e-operator In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/override ci/prow/ci-bundle-wmco-bundle ci/prow/images ci/prow/lint ci/prow/security ci/prow/unit |
|
/override ci/prow/aws-e2e-operator ci/prow/azure-e2e-operator ci/prow/azure-e2e-upgrade ci/prow/gcp-e2e-operator ci/prow/nutanix-e2e-operator ci/prow/platform-none-vsphere-e2e-operator ci/prow/vsphere-proxy-e2e-operator ci/prow/vsphere-e2e-operator ci/prow/wicd-unit-vsphere ci/prow/vsphere-disconnected-e2e-operator |
|
@sebsoto: Overrode contexts on behalf of sebsoto: ci/prow/ci-bundle-wmco-bundle, ci/prow/images, ci/prow/lint, ci/prow/security, ci/prow/unit In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@sebsoto: Overrode contexts on behalf of sebsoto: ci/prow/aws-e2e-operator, ci/prow/azure-e2e-operator, ci/prow/azure-e2e-upgrade, ci/prow/gcp-e2e-operator, ci/prow/nutanix-e2e-operator, ci/prow/platform-none-vsphere-e2e-operator, ci/prow/vsphere-disconnected-e2e-operator, ci/prow/vsphere-e2e-operator, ci/prow/vsphere-proxy-e2e-operator, ci/prow/wicd-unit-vsphere In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
4c00686
into
openshift:release-4.18
|
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62480: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62480 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@sebsoto: new pull request created: #3446 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
This is an automated cherry-pick of #3234
/assign sebsoto