Skip to content

Conversation

tmshort
Copy link
Contributor

@tmshort tmshort commented Sep 12, 2025

PR #2195 broke the downstream build.

It seems that when this is downstreamed, and subsequently vendored and built within a container build that it's not entire rid of containers/images, as operator-framework/operator-registry still uses it, so there's still an indirect reference to containers/images in go.mod.

Reverting this in the downstream PR fixes the downstream build.

This reverts commit febdb59.

Description

Reviewer Checklist

  • API Go Documentation
  • Tests: Unit Tests (and E2E Tests, if appropriate)
  • Comprehensive Commit Messages
  • Links to related GitHub Issue(s)

This reverts PR2195
This reverts commit febdb59.

Signed-off-by: Todd Short <[email protected]>
@tmshort tmshort requested a review from a team as a code owner September 12, 2025 02:18
Copy link

netlify bot commented Sep 12, 2025

Deploy Preview for olmv1 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit b4828eb
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/olmv1/deploys/68c38308cde25b0008b06d0b
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-2215--olmv1.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmshort commented Sep 12, 2025

/hold

Alternatively, we can try to update operator-registry and pull that in ASAP, because this is blocking downstreaming.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 12, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 12, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 72.06%. Comparing base (6e22e2b) to head (b4828eb).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2215   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   72.06%   72.06%           
=======================================
  Files          85       85           
  Lines        8401     8401           
=======================================
  Hits         6054     6054           
  Misses       1943     1943           
  Partials      404      404           
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 39.39% <ø> (ø)
experimental-e2e 46.11% <ø> (-0.04%) ⬇️
unit 56.83% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@anik120
Copy link
Contributor

anik120 commented Sep 12, 2025

@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmshort commented Sep 12, 2025

/unhold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 12, 2025
@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmshort commented Sep 12, 2025

/approve

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 12, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: tmshort

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 12, 2025
@grokspawn
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 12, 2025
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit d0c7c0c into operator-framework:main Sep 12, 2025
25 checks passed
@tmshort tmshort deleted the revert-2195 branch September 12, 2025 16:00
anik120 added a commit to anik120/operator-controller that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2025
…amework#2215"

new operator-registry.v1.59.0 release contains migration, which should
fix the issue that necessitated operator-framework#2215
anik120 added a commit to anik120/operator-controller that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2025
new operator-registry.v1.59.0 release contains migration, which should
fix the issue that necessitated operator-framework#2215
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants