Skip to content

Conversation

cooolheater
Copy link

- Issue: There was int64->float64->int64 conversions
- Fix: Carry out the operation without passing through float64
Copy link
Member

@rhshadrach rhshadrach left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR! When changing behavior, please always add tests.


this, other = self.align(other)
fill_value_for_align = None
if all(self.dtypes.eq(np.int64)) and all(other.dtypes.eq(np.int64)):
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This needs to be a lot more robust, e.g. can't only be for int64.

@rhshadrach rhshadrach added Bug Dtype Conversions Unexpected or buggy dtype conversions labels Nov 6, 2024
@cooolheater
Copy link
Author

It seems this needs more general approach, and it would not suitable for a newbie like me. So, I'd like to just close this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Bug Dtype Conversions Unexpected or buggy dtype conversions

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

BUG: Series.combine_first loss of precision

2 participants