Skip to content

Conversation

@danolivo
Copy link
Contributor

@danolivo danolivo commented Nov 27, 2025

There are me also fix the issue with base image ...

@danolivo danolivo self-assigned this Nov 27, 2025
@danolivo danolivo added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 27, 2025
@danolivo danolivo force-pushed the spoc-345 branch 22 times, most recently from 657e32a to 35a6b4c Compare November 27, 2025 15:46
Designed to be highly competitive, this test consumes more CPU, disk, and
memory resources than usual. To let people pass basic checks on their ongoing
commits faster, turn off this test in the schedule and separate it as a GitHub
action.

Also, it appears that we copied Spock into the base image. Hence, the 'step-1'
Docker image might use oldish versions of the patches.
@danolivo danolivo requested a review from mason-sharp November 27, 2025 17:13
@danolivo danolivo changed the title SPOC-345 (Draft) SPOC-345: Move zodan sync test to separate github action Nov 27, 2025
There are some corner cases that, at least for now, need to involve both
the publisher and the subscriber when we try to determine whether all the data
is replicated (synchronisation has finished). So, rewrite the sync code
to sync_event/wait calls.

It seems that if we improve wait functions a little, it may serve to
multiple purposes. For example, we may add sync_event to the wait function,
replace integer timeouts with the Interval type, and introduce 'verbose' mode.
And yes, rewrite it as a function.
@danolivo danolivo requested a review from pct960 November 28, 2025 11:31
@danolivo
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pct960, doing this, I found an issue with the base image creation Dockerfile. If you can, please take a look - just to understand how worse it is and if my fix is correct.

Copy link
Contributor

@pct960 pct960 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mostly looks good. Only some minor changes are needed.
I couldn't get around to running the workflow, however.
Will do it after you merge.

@mason-sharp mason-sharp merged commit e0d6a1c into main Dec 2, 2025
5 checks passed
@mason-sharp mason-sharp deleted the spoc-345 branch December 2, 2025 15:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants