Skip to content

Conversation

@mconflitti-pbc
Copy link
Collaborator

Follow up from discussions:

On hold until we confirm final terminology: visitor vs viewer with @kellobri

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 17, 2025

☂️ Python Coverage

current status: ✅

Overall Coverage

Lines Covered Coverage Threshold Status
1793 1684 94% 0% 🟢

New Files

No new covered files...

Modified Files

File Coverage Status
src/posit/connect/_utils.py 100% 🟢
src/posit/connect/client.py 99% 🟢
src/posit/connect/external/databricks.py 91% 🟢
src/posit/connect/external/snowflake.py 91% 🟢
TOTAL 95% 🟢

updated for commit: 78370de by action🐍

@mconflitti-pbc mconflitti-pbc changed the title Update with_user_session_token method to be more robust and allow local development fix: Update with_user_session_token method to be more robust and allow local development Jan 17, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@toph-allen toph-allen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This generally looks good to me. Just one question / thought, but it's a very soft suggestion. I'll leave it to @tdstein to give the actual approval though. :)

Copy link
Collaborator

@tdstein tdstein left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for working through the feedback. Looks good to merge!

@mconflitti-pbc mconflitti-pbc merged commit 250e9a2 into main Jan 23, 2025
35 checks passed
@mconflitti-pbc mconflitti-pbc deleted the mconflitti/update-visitor-api-key-client-creation branch January 23, 2025 14:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants