Skip to content

Add explanation for PyBool_Check func in bool.rst #140536

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Add explanation for PyBool_Check func in bool.rst #140536

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion Doc/c-api/bool.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ are available, however.
.. c:function:: int PyBool_Check(PyObject *o)

Return true if *o* is of type :c:data:`PyBool_Type`. This function always
succeeds.
succeeds and always returns a valid boolean value.
Copy link
Member

@StanFromIreland StanFromIreland Oct 24, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I do not understand why this comment is necessary, per the previous line, it always succeeds, therefore it returns an integer, which is a valid boolean value, it makes it redundant? Can you please elaborate as to why this is needed?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@F18-Maverick F18-Maverick Oct 24, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, maybe your true, It's truely unnecessary. Sory about that, I'll close the PR soon.



.. c:var:: PyObject* Py_False
Expand Down
Loading