[ExecuTorch][#10447] Extend `PyBundledModule` with `extension.BundledModule` #11565

Gasoonjia · 2025-06-11T18:48:21Z

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

-> [ExecuTorch][#10447] Extend PyBundledModule with extension.BundledModule #11565
solve duplicate dependency issues to unblock pybinding backend migration #11566

Context

This issue is a step of #9638.

In #9638, we want to have extension.Module as the single source of implementation in pybindings, which means that pybindings.PyModule should use extension.Module rather than its own pybindings.Module.

Proposal

Now that we have extension.BundledModule ready, we want to test it out by having our existing PyBundledModule to extend it, and let verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py

Differential Revision: D73564127

…Module` # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py ghstack-source-id: 283524132 Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/) [ghstack-poisoned]

pytorch-bot · 2025-06-11T18:48:24Z

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/11565

📄 Preview Python docs built from this PR

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 30 New Failures, 1 Pending, 3 Unrelated Failures

As of commit 7987626 with merge base 6a4df94 ():

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

pull / test-llama-runner-linux (bf16, custom, linux.2xlarge, executorch-ubuntu-22.04-clang12) / linux-job (gh)
AttributeError: '_OpNamespace' 'llama' object has no attribute 'sdpa_with_kv_cache'
pull / test-llama-runner-linux (fp32, xnnpack+custom+qe, linux.2xlarge, executorch-ubuntu-22.04-clang12) / linux-job (gh)
AttributeError: '_OpNamespace' 'llama' object has no attribute 'sdpa_with_kv_cache'
pull / test-llama-runner-linux (fp32, xnnpack+custom+qe, linux.arm64.2xlarge, executorch-ubuntu-22.04-gc... / linux-job (gh)
AttributeError: '_OpNamespace' 'llama' object has no attribute 'sdpa_with_kv_cache'
pull / test-llama-runner-linux (fp32, xnnpack+custom+quantize_kv, linux.2xlarge, executorch-ubuntu-22.04... / linux-job (gh)
AttributeError: '_OpNamespace' 'llama' object has no attribute 'sdpa_with_kv_cache'
pull / test-llama-runner-linux (fp32, xnnpack+custom+quantize_kv, linux.arm64.2xlarge, executorch-ubuntu... / linux-job (gh)
AttributeError: '_OpNamespace' 'llama' object has no attribute 'sdpa_with_kv_cache'
pull / test-llama-runner-linux (fp32, xnnpack+quantize_kv, linux.2xlarge, executorch-ubuntu-22.04-clang12) / linux-job (gh)
AttributeError: '_OpNamespace' 'llama' object has no attribute 'sdpa_with_kv_cache'
pull / test-llama-runner-linux (fp32, xnnpack+quantize_kv, linux.arm64.2xlarge, executorch-ubuntu-22.04-... / linux-job (gh)
AttributeError: '_OpNamespace' 'llama' object has no attribute 'sdpa_with_kv_cache'
pull / test-llava-runner-linux / linux-job (gh)
test_llava
pull / test-moshi-linux / linux-job (gh)
test_mimi
pull / test-openvino-linux / linux-job (gh)
RuntimeError: Command docker exec -t 3c721d25ed361c1ba02e4c30fbaa1449dd905e878e0fd36f4bbd0e3a70a3770b /exec failed with exit code 1
pull / unittest / linux / linux-job (gh)
backends/xnnpack/test/ops/test_sub.py::TestSub::test_fp32_sub
pull / unittest / macos / macos-job (gh)
backends/xnnpack/test/passes/test_channels_last_tagged_reshape.py::TestChannelsLastTaggedReshapePass::test_conv_linear_dim_order_swaps
pull / unittest-arm-backend-with-no-fvp (test_pytest_models) / linux-job (gh)
RuntimeError: Command docker exec -t 3a05a8657d1dea957749be40a201d621d755eb1d5c6ac32f7c464969ec0bdb10 /exec failed with exit code 1
pull / unittest-editable / linux / linux-job (gh)
backends/xnnpack/test/ops/test_sub.py::TestSub::test_fp32_sub
pull / unittest-editable / macos / macos-job (gh)
backends/xnnpack/test/passes/test_channels_last_tagged_reshape.py::TestChannelsLastTaggedReshapePass::test_conv_linear_dim_order_swaps
trunk / test-arm-backend (test_pytest_models_ethosu_fvp) / linux-job (gh)
RuntimeError: Command docker exec -t 13cddadfb64a4cdebc7a6d07e7a07505a919c24941b77b4ea8030aee4dd6a4a8 /exec failed with exit code 1
trunk / test-huggingface-transformers (allenai/OLMo-1B-hf) / linux-job (gh)
AttributeError: '_OpNamespace' 'llama' object has no attribute 'sdpa_with_kv_cache'
trunk / test-huggingface-transformers (google/gemma-3-1b-it) / linux-job (gh)
AttributeError: '_OpNamespace' 'llama' object has no attribute 'sdpa_with_kv_cache'
trunk / test-huggingface-transformers (HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM2-135M) / linux-job (gh)
AttributeError: '_OpNamespace' 'llama' object has no attribute 'sdpa_with_kv_cache'
trunk / test-huggingface-transformers (meta-llama/Llama-3.2-1B) / linux-job (gh)
AttributeError: '_OpNamespace' 'llama' object has no attribute 'sdpa_with_kv_cache'
trunk / test-huggingface-transformers (Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B) / linux-job (gh)
AttributeError: '_OpNamespace' 'llama' object has no attribute 'sdpa_with_kv_cache'
trunk / test-llama-runner-linux (bf16, custom, linux.arm64.2xlarge, executorch-ubuntu-22.04-gcc11-aarch64) / linux-job (gh)
AttributeError: '_OpNamespace' 'llama' object has no attribute 'sdpa_with_kv_cache'
trunk / test-llama-runner-linux (fp32, xnnpack+custom, linux.2xlarge, executorch-ubuntu-22.04-clang12) / linux-job (gh)
AttributeError: '_OpNamespace' 'llama' object has no attribute 'sdpa_with_kv_cache'
trunk / test-llama-runner-linux (fp32, xnnpack+custom, linux.arm64.2xlarge, executorch-ubuntu-22.04-gcc11... / linux-job (gh)
AttributeError: '_OpNamespace' 'llama' object has no attribute 'sdpa_with_kv_cache'
trunk / test-llama-runner-mac (fp32, xnnpack+custom+quantize_kv) / macos-job (gh)
AttributeError: '_OpNamespace' 'llama' object has no attribute 'sdpa_with_kv_cache'
trunk / test-llama-torchao-lowbit / macos-job (gh)
AttributeError: '_OpNamespace' 'llama' object has no attribute 'sdpa_with_kv_cache'
trunk / test-models-macos (mv3, xnnpack-quantization-delegation) / macos-job (gh)
The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 128
trunk / unittest-nxp-neutron / linux-job (gh)
RuntimeError: Command docker exec -t d2f0b757786bae2ac3d11af9fe68836e2622623957f19b167db8869a7a5c1a2a /exec failed with exit code 1
trunk / unittest-release / linux / linux-job (gh)
backends/xnnpack/test/ops/test_sub.py::TestSub::test_fp32_sub
trunk / unittest-release / macos / macos-job (gh)
backends/xnnpack/test/ops/test_maxpool2d.py::TestMaxPool2d::test_fp16_maxpool2d

FLAKY - The following jobs failed but were likely due to flakiness present on trunk:

pull / unittest-arm-backend-with-no-fvp (test_pytest_ops) / linux-job (gh) (detected as infra flaky with no log or failing log classifier)
trunk / test-arm-backend (test_pytest_ops_ethosu_fvp) / linux-job (gh) (detected as infra flaky with no log or failing log classifier)

BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but were present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

pull / android / run-emulator (gh) (trunk failure)
The process '/usr/bin/sh' failed with exit code 255

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

…Module` # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py ghstack-source-id: 283524132 Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/) ghstack-source-id: 289635871 Pull Request resolved: #11565

facebook-github-bot · 2025-06-11T18:48:32Z

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73564127

…ion.BundledModule`" # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/) [ghstack-poisoned]

facebook-github-bot · 2025-06-11T18:49:08Z

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73564127

github-actions · 2025-06-11T18:49:30Z

This PR needs a `release notes:` label

If your change should be included in the release notes (i.e. would users of this library care about this change?), please use a label starting with release notes:. This helps us keep track and include your important work in the next release notes.

To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "release notes: none"

For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.

…ion.BundledModule`" # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/) [ghstack-poisoned]

…Module` Pull Request resolved: #11565 # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py ghstack-source-id: 289747495 ghstack-source-id: 289747495 @exported-using-ghexport Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/)

facebook-github-bot · 2025-06-11T19:00:16Z

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73564127

lucylq

Thanks for adding this!

…ion.BundledModule`" # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/) [ghstack-poisoned]

…Module` Pull Request resolved: #11565 # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py ghstack-source-id: 289769823 ghstack-source-id: 289769823 @exported-using-ghexport Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/)

facebook-github-bot · 2025-06-11T20:18:16Z

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73564127

…ion.BundledModule`" # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/) [ghstack-poisoned]

…Module` Pull Request resolved: #11565 # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py ghstack-source-id: 289776209 ghstack-source-id: 289776209 @exported-using-ghexport Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/)

facebook-github-bot · 2025-06-11T20:39:10Z

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73564127

…ion.BundledModule`" # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/) [ghstack-poisoned]

…Module` Pull Request resolved: #11565 # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py ghstack-source-id: 289797070 ghstack-source-id: 289797070 @exported-using-ghexport Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/)

facebook-github-bot · 2025-06-11T21:44:49Z

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73564127

…ion.BundledModule`" # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/) [ghstack-poisoned]

…Module` Pull Request resolved: #11565 # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py ghstack-source-id: 289797070 ghstack-source-id: 289797070 @exported-using-ghexport Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/)

facebook-github-bot · 2025-06-11T22:50:11Z

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73564127

…ion.BundledModule`" # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/) [ghstack-poisoned]

…Module` Pull Request resolved: #11565 # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py ghstack-source-id: 289817714 ghstack-source-id: 289817714 @exported-using-ghexport Differential Revision: [D73564127](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D73564127/)

facebook-github-bot · 2025-06-12T04:17:26Z

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73564127

@Gasoonjia

…Module` (#11595) This PR was created by the merge bot to help merge the original PR into the main branch. ghstack PR number: #11565 by @Gasoonjia ^ Please use this as the source of truth for the PR details, comments, and reviews ghstack PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/gasoonjia/13/base ghstack PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/gasoonjia/13/head Merge bot PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/gasoonjia/14/orig Merge bot PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/gasoonjia/13/orig @diff-train-skip-merge --------- Co-authored-by: gasoonjia <[email protected]>

…Module` Pull Request resolved: #11565 # Context This issue is a step of #9638. In #9638, we want to have `extension.Module` as the single source of implementation in `pybindings`, which means that `pybindings.PyModule` should use `extension.Module` rather than its own `pybindings.Module`. # Proposal Now that we have `extension.BundledModule` ready, we want to test it out by having our existing `PyBundledModule` to extend it, and let `verify_result_with_bundled_expected_output` to use it, so that we can test out the whole thing with https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/blob/fb45e19055a92d2a91a4d4b7008e135232cbb14b/devtools/bundled_program/test/test_end2end.py ghstack-source-id: 290750933 ghstack-source-id: 290750933 @exported-using-ghexport Differential Revision: [D76751313](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D76751313/)

Gasoonjia requested review from JacobSzwejbka and larryliu0820 as code owners June 11, 2025 18:48

facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Jun 11, 2025

facebook-github-bot added the fb-exported label Jun 11, 2025

Gasoonjia mentioned this pull request Jun 11, 2025

solve duplicate dependency issues to unblock pybinding backend migration #11566

Merged

lucylq approved these changes Jun 11, 2025

View reviewed changes

Gasoonjia requested a review from shoumikhin as a code owner June 11, 2025 20:17

Gasoonjia requested review from jathu and kirklandsign as code owners June 11, 2025 22:49

jathu added ciflow/trunk ciflow/binaries labels Jun 11, 2025

facebook-github-bot merged commit bb85e97 into gh/gasoonjia/13/base Jun 12, 2025
172 of 208 checks passed

facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/gasoonjia/13/head branch June 12, 2025 05:46

facebook-github-bot temporarily deployed to cherry-pick-bot June 12, 2025 05:46 — with GitHub Actions Inactive

pytorchbot mentioned this pull request Jun 12, 2025

[ExecuTorch][#10447] Extend PyBundledModule with extension.BundledModule #11595

Merged

Gasoonjia mentioned this pull request Jun 16, 2025

Revert D76405701 #11736

Open

Uh oh!

[ExecuTorch][#10447] Extend PyBundledModule with extension.BundledModule #11565

[ExecuTorch][#10447] Extend PyBundledModule with extension.BundledModule #11565

Uh oh!

Conversation

Gasoonjia commented Jun 11, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Context

Proposal

Uh oh!

pytorch-bot bot commented Jun 11, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/11565

❌ 30 New Failures, 1 Pending, 3 Unrelated Failures

Uh oh!

facebook-github-bot commented Jun 11, 2025

Uh oh!

facebook-github-bot commented Jun 11, 2025

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Jun 11, 2025

This PR needs a release notes: label

Uh oh!

facebook-github-bot commented Jun 11, 2025

Uh oh!

lucylq left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

facebook-github-bot commented Jun 11, 2025

Uh oh!

facebook-github-bot commented Jun 11, 2025

Uh oh!

facebook-github-bot commented Jun 11, 2025

Uh oh!

facebook-github-bot commented Jun 11, 2025

Uh oh!

facebook-github-bot commented Jun 12, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

5 participants

[ExecuTorch][#10447] Extend `PyBundledModule` with `extension.BundledModule` #11565

[ExecuTorch][#10447] Extend `PyBundledModule` with `extension.BundledModule` #11565

Gasoonjia commented Jun 11, 2025 •

edited

Loading

pytorch-bot bot commented Jun 11, 2025 •

edited

Loading

This PR needs a `release notes:` label