[3.15] Upgrade to Hibernate ORM 6.6.3.Final #44703
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… when it's unsupported
…nsupported classes For backwards compatibility reasons.
|
/cc @gsmet (hibernate-orm) |
gsmet
approved these changes
Nov 26, 2024
Member
gsmet
left a comment
gsmet
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We will consider it in the next backport round.
Contributor
|
@gsmet do you have an estimate on when this will be backported ? |
Member
|
@rsvoboda @gastaldi @aloubyansky @jmartisk I think we forgot to consider this one. I think it should be included in 3.15. Let's make sure we have @rsvoboda 's blessing but once we do, please merge this. |
gastaldi
approved these changes
Dec 28, 2024
jmartisk
approved these changes
Jan 2, 2025
rsvoboda
approved these changes
Jan 2, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backport of #44391 to branch 3.15. Supersedes #44658, because we don't want this in 3.16 after all.
I switched to a more conservative behavior for bytecode enhancement in the last commit, especially because I'm not sure we want the failure in 3.15/3.16.
If you think we do want the failure, let me know and I'll drop the last commit.