RDKEMW-242: Sky-llama bringup in rdke

[Sonajeya31]

Reason for change: Adding the motiondetector-hal-noop recipe
Test Procedure: Build and verify

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[rdkcmf-jenkins]

b'## Copyright scan failure
Commit: 2a7772c
Report detail: https://gist.github.com/rdkcmf-jenkins/5b86312b1209a66660fde239d1f8c286'

[rdkcmf-jenkins]

b'## Blackduck scan failure details

Summary: 0 violations, 0 files pending approval, 1 file pending identification.

• Protex Server Path: /home/blackduck/github/meta-rdk-halif-headers/83/rdkcentral/meta-rdk-halif-headers

• Commit: 2a7772c

Report detail: gist'

[mhughesacn]

1. Please remove the header on this file. By convention, metadata files don't have headers.
2. This is an opensourced repo so is SRC_URI headed for opensourcing soon?
3. If so, LICENSE will need to be Apache-2.0 before opensourcing.

[akhil1257]

meta-rdk-halif-headers is for RDK hal headers recipe, this may not be the right place to add stub code recipe

[outdooruseonly]

I agree with Akhil. This repo is not for stub implementations. It is ONLY for hal interface definition.
If this change is thought to be required then the approach needs to be reviewed.
Please block pending review,

[Ulrond]

should be removed, it's in the wrong place.

[Ulrond]

this is a platform independent meta directory, can't have anything specific to any platform, nor should it contain stubs.

These are used across all platforms in an independent layer way. They're a layer on their own in effect.

If you need stubs, then you need to create them in the vendor layer that implemented the code.

Are we looking at this the wrong way round though, what is the reason why you need a stub? Only on platforms where motion detector is present, then sure the code should exist all the way down... But on platforms where motion detection doesn't' exist, then none of the verticals should be installed, and errors should be reported back to the app, needs review with architecture team on how this should work.