Skip to content

Conversation

@themr0c
Copy link
Member

@themr0c themr0c commented Oct 7, 2025

IMPORTANT: Do Not Merge - To be merged by Docs Team Only

Version(s): release-1.7, 1.8

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHDHBUGS-2070
Preview:

Signed-off-by: Fabrice Flore-Thébault <[email protected]>
@themr0c themr0c requested review from jmagak and rm3l October 7, 2025 14:23
@rhdh-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

rhdh-bot commented Oct 7, 2025

Copy link
Member

@Fortune-Ndlovu Fortune-Ndlovu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@Fortune-Ndlovu
Copy link
Member

@themr0c looking at the preview under:
2.1. Installing Red Hat Developer Hub in a fully disconnected environment with the Operator
, I see we say:
(Recommended) You have installed the oc-mirror tool, with a version corresponding to the version of your OpenShift Container Platform cluster.

but then later say:
(Optional) Uses the oc-mirror OpenShift Container Platform CLI plugin to mirror images.

we should up Change the procedure callouts from "(Optional)" to "(Recommended)" to match the prerequisites. This maintains consistency and reinforces that while users can skip it, they shouldn't for OpenShift environments because using oc-mirror is the recommended way for mirroring on regular OpenShift clusters. wdyt?

Signed-off-by: Fabrice Flore-Thébault <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Fabrice Flore-Thébault <[email protected]>
@themr0c
Copy link
Member Author

themr0c commented Oct 8, 2025

@Fortune-Ndlovu I believe I adressed all your suggestions.

I made some additional changes to prepare for the AEM migration and simplify some steps that seemed unnecessarly complex.

Can you have another round of review?

@themr0c
Copy link
Member Author

themr0c commented Oct 9, 2025

I am aware that we will have to update the procedure for oc-mirror v2. See https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHDHBUGS-2062

@themr0c themr0c added Technical review done ⛅ Any procedure has been succesfully tested and removed Technical review needed 🔩 Test all the procedures labels Oct 9, 2025
@themr0c
Copy link
Member Author

themr0c commented Oct 9, 2025

/cherry-pick release-1.7

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@themr0c: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-1.7 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-1.7

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link
Member

@rm3l rm3l left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Oct 9, 2025
Copy link
Member

@jmagak jmagak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A few minor comments

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm label Oct 9, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 9, 2025

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@themr0c themr0c enabled auto-merge (squash) October 9, 2025 12:00
@themr0c themr0c merged commit cc2cc43 into redhat-developer:main Oct 9, 2025
3 checks passed
@themr0c themr0c deleted the RHDHBUGS-2070 branch October 9, 2025 12:01
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@themr0c: new pull request created: #1436

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-1.7

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

themr0c added a commit to themr0c/red-hat-developers-documentation-rhdh that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2025
Gerry-Forde pushed a commit to Gerry-Forde/red-hat-developers-documentation-rhdh-v2 that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants