target/riscv: Adjust to upstream coding style#1254
Open
berolinux wants to merge 1 commit intoriscv-collab:riscvfrom
Open
target/riscv: Adjust to upstream coding style#1254berolinux wants to merge 1 commit intoriscv-collab:riscvfrom
berolinux wants to merge 1 commit intoriscv-collab:riscvfrom
Conversation
Adjust code to meet upstream OpenOCD's coding style requests (in particular "no new typedefs") Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>
Collaborator
JanMatCodasip
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for the contribution.
I checked the changes visually and noticed that there are still some typedefs left in the RISC-V code (e.g. dm013_info_t and several more).
Have you decided to not replace those for some reason?
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adjust code to meet upstream OpenOCD's coding style requests (in particular "no new typedefs")